Finite-Size Limits of Adaptive Pauli Prediction
quant-ph
Submitted: 2026-10-09
Updated: 2026-10-09
Comments: 18 pages, 2 figures; includes 13 pages of Supplemental Material
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Can quantum data reliably answer questions chosen from earlier results? We prove that M adaptive Pauli predictions on n qubits require Ω(sqrt n,M) copies at fixed accuracy.
Abstract
Can quantum data reliably answer questions chosen from earlier results? We prove that M adaptive Pauli predictions on n qubits require Ω(sqrt n,M) copies at fixed accuracy. Published upper bounds make this tight for M n. Thus n adaptive predictions cost Θ(sqrt n) copies, whereas a fixed list costs only O(n). The lower bound uses diagonal states and commuting observables, identifying a statistical cost of adaptation. We also quantify how this cost increases with precision.
Sources
- Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning
- Dimension-Free Polylogarithmic Quantum Shadow Tomography
- Interactive Fingerprinting Codes and the Hardness of Preventing False Discovery
- Online Shadow Tomography Matching the Classical Bounds
- The Limits of Post-Selection Generalization
- Fingerprinting Codes Meet Geometry: Improved Lower Bounds for Private Query Release and Adaptive Data Analysis
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians