A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.
Kai: I'm Kai, and with me are Mira and Lev, guest researcher.
Mira: Today's paper: "A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit".
Kai: The gist:
Mira: First, who's behind it and why it matters.
Paper summary: Kai: So, to recap, this paper by Trond Hjerpekjøn et al. is all about extending gap engineering beyond just the Josephson junction to protect superconducting qubits from quasiparticles caused by high-energy radiation or optical fields.
Mira: They use a flux-tunable transmon with a niobium ground plane and island combined with aluminum junctions that are specifically engineered by varying the film thicknesses—using one hundred nanometers for the thicker, low-gap lead and eighteen nanometers for the thinner, high-gap lead <ref:2610.12227#pg2,for the thicker, low-gap lead and>.
Kai: The main claim they make is that this approach allows them to withstand more than an order of magnitude higher near-infrared optical power before excess relaxation appears compared to a standard all-aluminum transmon with similar junctions.
Mira: They also found that over the same power range, the niobium device showed no frequency shift caused by quasiparticles, which indicates a very low density of these particles near the junctions.
Lev: From an error correction standpoint, if the density is so low that you don't see a frequency shift, does that mean we can actually trust our coherence times more when operating near light sources?
Kai: Not quite. The paper also notes that even with this protection against relaxation, dephasing and state-preparation-and-measurement infidelity still go up as the optical power goes higher.
Mira: That’s a crucial distinction; it shows that while you can keep the qubit from dying quickly due to quasiparticles tunneling across the junction, there are other ways optical fields are still causing errors in how we prepare and measure the qubit state.
Lev: So, even with this enhanced resilience against relaxation bursts, the work identifies remaining limitations relevant to both radiation error bursts and circuits near optical fields.
Kai: That’s right; they aren't saying it's a complete fix for all noise, just that engineering the energy landscape beyond the junction can substantially increase qubit resilience.
Conclusion: Kai: So, looking at this paper, "A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit," the authors are demonstrating a specific way to build a transmon that’s tougher against noise from radiation and optical fields.
Mira: The core of it is extending the gap engineering beyond the junction itself by using a niobium ground plane and island with those specially tuned aluminum junctions, which lets them handle much more light power before relaxation starts becoming an issue.
Lev: What this means for us on the hardware side is that we might be able to build circuits that are more resilient when we inevitably run them near optical systems, like those used in quantum optics experiments.
Kai: It means for the broader field, it suggests that designing the entire quasiparticle energy landscape around a qubit is a more powerful tool than just tuning the junction itself.
Mira: The paper highlights that while they significantly increased resilience against relaxation errors, they also found that dephasing and measurement errors still increase with optical power, so we have to keep looking at those other noise sources.
Lev: So, for someone interested in error correction, it points toward a design strategy where we actively try to push the quasiparticles away from the sensitive parts of the circuit.
Kai: That’s essentially what they show; engineering that energy landscape is key to building qubits that can survive both radiation errors and proximity to optical light.
Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology
quant-ph
Submitted: 2026-10-08
Updated: 2026-10-08
Comments: 13 pages, 9 figures
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Importance score: 93/100
The gist: The gist: Engineering the quasiparticle energy landscape beyond Josephson junctions can substantially increase qubit resilience while identifying remaining limitations relevant to both
Key concepts
- Quasiparticle Poisoning
- These are unwanted excitations (quasiparticles) created in superconducting circuits by high-energy radiation or stray infrared photons. These particles break Cooper pairs, leading to energy loss and causing the qubit to relax or change its state, which is a major source of error.
- Gap Engineering Beyond the Junction
- This technique involves modifying the superconducting material properties throughout the device, not just at one junction. In this study, it means engineering the gap across a niobium transmon using a gold-on-niobium ground plane and carefully tuning aluminum junctions to keep these error-inducing quasiparticles away from where they cause problems.
- Transmon Qubit
- A transmon is a specific type of superconducting circuit used as a qubit. It consists of an island connected to two Josephson junctions. By engineering the materials and geometry, researchers created two versions—one niobium and one aluminum—to test how different materials affect protection against quasiparticle errors.
- Gap Engineering
- This is the process of controlling the energy gap in a superconductor, which dictates how easily Cooper pairs can break apart. By carefully adjusting film thicknesses (like 100 nm or 18 nm) for the junctions, researchers created 'strongly gap-engineered' junctions designed to repel quasiparticles from the sensitive areas.
Terminology
Summary
The gist: Engineering the quasiparticle energy landscape beyond Josephson junctions can substantially increase qubit resilience while identifying remaining limitations relevant to both radiation-induced error bursts and superconducting circuits operated near optical fields.
Motivation
Superconducting circuits are vulnerable to quasiparticles (QPs) generated by high-energy radiation or optical fields, which can induce relaxation by tunneling across a Josephson junction (JJ) The resulting correlated error bursts are not correctable with standard quantum error-correcting codes When superconducting circuits are intentionally operated near optical fields, stray infrared photons can generate QPs that break Cooper pairs and create QPs Suppressing QP poisoning is thus a key requirement for superconducting circuits that must operate in proximity to optical fields
Methodology
The researchers extended gap engineering beyond the JJ by engineering the quasiparticle energy landscape of the transmon to keep QPs away from the junction leads The device combines a Nb/Au ground plane and island with strongly gap-engineered Al JJs They compare this Nb device with an all-Al transmon designed to reproduce the strongly gap-engineered devices of Ref. [30] The Al junctions were engineered by setting film thicknesses to tthick = 100 nm for the thicker, low-gap lead and tthin = 18 nm for the thinner, high-gap lead The Nb transmon uses a 150 nm sputtered Nb ground plane and qubit island Niobium is attractive for radiation-resilient circuits because nonequilibrium QPs can relax on nanosecond timescales much faster than the millisecond-scale QP lifetimes reported in Al
Key Findings
The Nb transmon withstands more than an order of magnitude higher optical power before excess relaxation appears compared to an all-Al transmon with nominally identical junctions Over the same power range, the Nb transmon shows no resolvable quasiparticle-induced frequency shift, consistent with a low QP density near the JJs Dephasing and state-preparation-and-measurement (SPAM) infidelity nevertheless increase with optical power even while relaxation remains protected
Limitations and Further Investigation
The protection is not complete, however, as dephasing and SPAM infidelity increase with optical power even while the relaxation rate remains unchanged The qubit transition frequency is sensitive to the Josephson energy EJ = Φ0Ic/2π QPs in the JJ leads suppress the critical current and consequently induce a downward shift of the qubit frequency δωq = ωq(Po)−ωq(0) which provides a probe of the QP population near the junctions While previous measurements found no significant difference in robustness among strongly gap-engineered qubits operated at different frequencies within the same protected regime, this frequency difference may contribute to the quantitative comparison The results suggest that engineering the quasiparticle energy landscape beyond the junction can substantially increase qubit resilience while identifying remaining limitations relevant to both radiation-induced error bursts and superconducting circuits operated near optical fields Further improvements will require identifying these remaining mechanisms and controlling QP generation, transport, and trapping throughout the device
Device Parameters
Table I summarizes the device parameters for the two transmons without laser light, showing that the Nb transmon has a maximum frequency ωq/2π of 4.404 GHz compared to 5.389 GHz for the Al transmon The qubit lifetime T1 is reported as 40–50 µs for both devices Ramsey coherence time T∗2 is estimated at 20–30 µs for the Nb transmon and 5–6 µs for the Al transmon
Optical Response
The internal quality factor of resonators made from Al and Nb shows that the loss in the Al resonator increases monotonically with Po, consistent with increasing distributed microwave loss from optically generated QPs The onset of degradation in the Nb transmon at high optical power could be caused by QPs tunneling across the JJs despite the engineered gap difference, for example after QPs absorb high-frequency phonons generated by recombination in the Nb film Modeling suggests that a QP density 500 times greater than in bulk Al is required in the bandages to cause similar quality factors between the transmon and resonator at Po = 100 nW The simulation results show that the required sheet resistance Rs to reproduce the measured QP-limited internal quality factor at Po = 100 nW is approximately 0.7 µomega/□ The simulation also shows that the transmon’s quality factor is not limited by bandage resistance below Rs ∼ 10 µomega/□
Conclusion
The researchers demonstrate a transmon architecture that extends gap engineering beyond the JJ by engineering the landscape of the superconducting gap across the entire device This approach increases the optical power required to induce excess relaxation by more than an order of magnitude compared to an all-Al transmon with nominally identical junctions The protection is not complete, however, as dephasing and SPAM infidelity increase with optical power even while the relaxation rate remains unchanged Promising directions include reducing the role of Al in the most QP-sensitive regions and exploring alternative junction materials Device-level control of quasiparticles provides a route toward superconducting qubits that better withstand both radiation-induced error bursts and nearby optical fields
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Amr Osman, Claudia Castillo-Moreno, Kunal Helambe, and Simon Sundelin for advice that enabled the fabrication of the samples The devices were fabricated in the MyFab Nanofabrication Laboratory at Chalmers W.W. acknowledges support in part by the Knut och Alice Wallenberg Foundation through a Wallenberg Scholar grant R.V.L. acknowledges support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation through the Wallenberg Centre for Quantum Technology through a WACQT Fellowship, from the European Research Council via Starting Grant 948265, and from the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research via grant FFL21-0039 S.G. acknowledges financial support from the European Research Council (Grant No. 101041744 ESQuAT), and from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation through the Wallenberg Centre for Quantum Technology (WACQT)
Appendix Details
Appendix A details the device design and parameters, including film thicknesses tthick = 100 nm for the thicker, low-gap lead and tthin = 18 nm for the thinner, high-gap lead Appendix B describes the measurement setup involving a dilution refrigerator and optical power control via a variable optical attenuator (VOA) Appendix C presents calculations of QP density in the Al resonator using Mattis-Bardeen theory Appendix D models the transmon with low-gap Al bandages and derives an estimate for the QP density in the bandages required to reproduce measured quality factors Appendix E performs eigenmode simulations to investigate the effects of QP poisoning of the bandages in the transmon Appendix F discusses hot quasiparticles and their coupling to a hot phonon bath, noting that this coupling may produce a QP energy distribution characterized by an effective temperature higher than that of the mixing chamber Appendix G describes transmon thermometry using Rabi oscillations to estimate the population in e⟩ after a passive reset Appendix H investigates how the relaxation rate of the Al transmon changes after laser pulses, showing a slow recovery consistent with slow QP relaxation and trapping in the JJs Appendix I discusses maximum optical power and compatibility with optically driven devices, noting that results are specific to the deliberately reflective package used
Table I Summary
The table summarizes the device parameters for the two transmons without laser light, showing that Nb has a maximum frequency ωq/2π of 4.404 GHz and T1 values of 40–50 µs The Al transmon has a maximum frequency ωq/2π of 5.389 GHz and T1 values of 40–50 µs The readout resonance frequencies are listed as ωr/2π = 6.705 GHz for Al and 6.624 GHz for Nb The thin-lead thickness tthin is 18 nm for both devices The thick-lead thickness tthick is 100 nm for the Al device and 18 nm for the Nb device The bandage thickness tbandage is 300 nm for both devices
Table II Summary
Table II presents estimated QP density in the Al resonator as a function of applied optical power and corresponding measured internal quality factor Q, showing that at zero optical power Q = 2.1 × 10 6 For Po ≥ 1 nW, excess energy loss relative to this value is assumed to be due to QPs The estimated QP densities increase with optical power, reaching a maximum of 5.
Improvements for AI systems
-
textbfQuasiparticle Poisoning Resilience in Qubit Design (Nb/Au Transmon): The improved system can withstand
more than an order of magnitude higher near-infrared optical power before excess relaxation appears
compared to all-aluminum devices, increasing the operational range for superconducting circuits near optical fields by a factor of ten. -
textbfFrequency Stability Against Optical Fields: The system exhibits
no resolvable quasiparticle-induced frequency shift over the same power range,
suggesting that engineering the quasiparticle energy landscapecan substantially increase qubit resilience
to nearby optical fields, even while dephasing and SPAM infidelity increase. -
textbfError Channel Identification: The improved system allows researchers to distinguish between relaxation protection and other errors, as
dephasing and state-preparation-and-measurement (SPAM) infidelity increase with optical power even while relaxation remains unchanged,
identifyingadditional error channels once QP-induced relaxation is suppressed.
-
textbfMaterial Engineering for Qubit Protection: The system demonstrates the benefit of engineering the
quasiparticle energy landscape beyond the junction,
suggesting future improvements should focus onreducing the role of Al in the most QP-sensitive regions
and exploring materials like Niobium for enhanced radiation resilience. -
textbfThermal Resilience Assessment: The system provides a method to assess qubit temperature under illumination, as it
observe[s] no increase in the transmon’s excited-state population as we increase the optical power,
confirming that residual excited-state population remains low even at higher optical powers.
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians
- Universal Bound and Phase Transition in Many-Body Fermionic Non-Gaussianity