Decoder- and Noise-Aware Optimization Framework for Clifford-Deformed Quantum Error-Correcting Codes
quant-ph
Submitted: 2026-10-09
Updated: 2026-10-09
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Practical fault-tolerant quantum computing requires qubit-efficient quantum error correction (QEC).
Abstract
Practical fault-tolerant quantum computing requires qubit-efficient quantum error correction (QEC). Clifford deformations (CDs) modify the stabilizers of a QEC code to lower its logical error rate at no additional resource cost. However, the number of possible CDs grows exponentially with the number of qubits, making exhaustive search infeasible beyond small codes. In this work, we further show that under circuit level noise the optimal CD depends strongly on both the noise model and decoder. To make systematic CD optimization possible, we introduce Evolution-Based Best-arm Identification (EBBI), a shot-efficient search algorithm that treats the circuit, noise model and decoder as a black box. We benchmark EBBI's performance on the rotated surface code, under two strongly Z-biased circuit-level noise models with the PyMatching decoder. At distance 3, EBBI finds the optimal CD using up to about 1100 times fewer shots than random search. At distance 5, when run at the target error rate, the median EBBI run converges to the CDs we believe to be optimal, while random search never converges. Under a Z-biased SI1000-like noise model, EBBI discovers a new CD, the B-XZZX code, which we generalized to larger distances. It differs from XZZX on only a fraction O(d-1) of the qubits at code distance d, yet its relative advantage grows from about 5% at d = 3 to about 12% at d = 11. We thus show that the B-XZZX pattern found by EBBI can be systematically scaled to larger code distances. Our work represents a first step towards scalable CD optimization for general QEC codes.
Sources
- The Pinnacle Architecture: Reducing the cost of breaking RSA-2048 to 100 000 physical qubits using quantum LDPC codes
- Shor's algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits
- Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities: Resource Estimates and Mitigations
- Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary
- Tour de gross: A modular quantum computer based on bivariate bicycle codes
- Nearest-neighbour gates are all you need: High-rate quantum low-density parity-check codes on a planar grid
- Vine Codes: Low-Overhead Quantum LDPC Codes on a Planar Square Grid
- Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction
- Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator
- Tesseract: A Search-Based Decoder for Quantum Error Correction
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians