The power of time reversal in Hamiltonian property testing
quant-ph
Submitted: 2026-10-04
Updated: 2026-10-04
Comments: 36 pages, 2 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Quantum algorithms enable Heisenberg-limited scaling across many tasks in sensing and learning, achieving precision epsilon using O(1/epsilon) total evolution time.
Abstract
Quantum algorithms enable Heisenberg-limited scaling across many tasks in sensing and learning, achieving precision epsilon using O(1/epsilon) total evolution time. However, in Hamiltonian property testing, the best known algorithms have O(1/epsilon 2) total evolution time, unless it is possible to reverse the flow of time under the Hamiltonian. In this work, we prove that time reversal is necessary to close this gap. We establish evolution time lower bounds for Hamiltonian certification and locality testing, for a continuous family of error metrics ranging from average- to worst-case. We also prove matching upper bounds for Hamiltonian certification in all cases, both with and without time reversal, showing that the advantage from time reversal persists. Our results follow from a new Fourier-analytic approach to quantum lower bounds in continuous time, which is sensitive to time reversal and applicable beyond Hamiltonian property testing. This gives an alternative proof that inverses are required for amplitude amplification and estimation, improving the lower bounds of Tang and Wright and extending to fractional queries. We also show that, for unstructured search, uncertainty in the phase of the oracle destroys the quantum speedup without inverse queries, even when the oracle is fixed and coherent. Our work rigorously establishes time reversal as a resource governing both the precision of quantum measurement and the robustness of quantum algorithms.
Sources
- Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitaries
- Testing and learning structured quantum Hamiltonians
- Certifying and learning local quantum Hamiltonians
- Unitary Complexity and the Uhlmann Transformation Problem
- Controlization Schemes Based on Orthogonal Arrays
- Adaptivity can help exponentially for shadow tomography
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?
- Quantum Algorithm for Reversing Unknown Unitary Evolutions
- Information-theoretic Hardness of Out-of-time-order Correlators
- Approximation does not help in quantum unitary time-reversal
- Quantum vs Classical Proofs and Subset Verification
- Autonomous Hamiltonian certification and changepoint detection
- Quantum Lazy Sampling and Path Recording for Any Group
- Nearly Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Estimating Multiple Expectation Values
- The Compressed Oracle is a Worthy (Multiplicative) Adversary
- Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer Problem
- A Universal Protocol for Quantum-Enhanced Sensing via Information Scrambling
- Improving Metrology with Quantum Scrambling
- Analysis of Boolean Functions
- Higher-order quantum transformations of Hamiltonian dynamics
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians