Certification failure in variational-principle observables

arXiv:2610.03989 · quant-ph · Submitted 2026-10-02 · Read on arXiv

quant-ph

Submitted: 2026-10-02

Updated: 2026-10-02

Comments: 10 pages, 4 figures

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Algorithms which prepare states via the variational principle assume that closeness in energy implies closeness in state; we formalise how this assumption can fail by showing that a ground-state

Abstract

Algorithms which prepare states via the variational principle assume that closeness in energy implies closeness in state; we formalise how this assumption can fail by showing that a ground-state energy estimate converged to within ε of the true value is compatible with observable expectation values in error by up to sqrt 2εχ O at leading order, where χ O is the static susceptibility of the observable. As a result, the observable error can be orders of magnitude larger than the energy error, a mechanism we call non-linear error amplification, and because a variational algorithm cannot guarantee the correctness of these properties from energy alone, energy does not necessarily certify an observable. In light of our findings, we examine three algorithms: the variational quantum eigensolver on the transverse-field Ising chain, the density-matrix renormalisation group on a pair of weakly coupled hydrogen chains, and Krylov quantum diagonalisation on lithium fluoride. In each case we demonstrate that a well-converged energy can leave observables uncertified.

Sources

Related papers