On quantum interactive proofs with a laconic prover
quant-ph, cs.CC, cs.CR
Submitted: 2026-09-30
Updated: 2026-10-05
Comments: 66 pages, 4 protocols, 2 algorithms, 3 circuits, 4 tables. v2: Minor changes
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Interactive proof systems with a laconic prover, studied by Goldreich, Vadhan, and Wigderson (CC, 2002), capture problems verifiable with logarithmic prover communication in the classical setting.
Terminology
Abstract
Interactive proof systems with a laconic prover, studied by Goldreich, Vadhan, and Wigderson (CC, 2002), capture problems verifiable with logarithmic prover communication in the classical setting. For two-message quantum analogs, even a single-bit prover response contains quantum statistical zero-knowledge (QSZK), introduced by Watrous (FOCS 2002). However, restricting the verifier's question to classical public coins collapses the corresponding class to BQP, as shown by Beigi, Shor, and Watrous (ToC, 2011). We further study two-message quantum interactive proof systems with a laconic prover. To this end, we introduce the class QIP- bit(2), where is the length of the prover's response, and establish: 1. A natural complete characterization of QIP- bit(2) by Multi-State Distinguishability. In particular, Quantum State Distinguishability (QSD) is QIP bit-complete. Since QSD is QSZK-hard, our result places QIP- bit(2), for at least 2, in a landscape "just above" QSZK. 2. Easy regimes for QIP- bit(2) collapsing to QSZK. We prove that QSD [a,b] (and thus QIP bit[a,b]) is in QSZK when a(n)-b(n) at least 1/O(n), and combine this with an answer compression from QIP- bit[2,c,s] to QIP bit to obtain another easy regime when 2c>(1+2/2)s. Remarkably, our improved polarization applies to SD and SZK, resolving an open problem in Sahai and Vadhan (JACM, 2003). 3. Quantum public coins also make the interaction useless: qc- QAM [O(sqrt)] with constant gap is in BQP, where qc- QAM [] is a subclass of QIP- bit(2) in which the verifier's question is exactly halves of EPR pairs.
Sources
- Upper bounds on the error probabilities and asymptotic error exponents in quantum multiple state discrimination
- Improvements in Quantum SDP-Solving with Applications
- Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series
- Properties of Classical and Quantum Jensen-Shannon Divergence
- Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation
- Quantum interactive proofs with short messages
- Hamiltonian Simulation Using Linear Combinations of Unitary Operations
- Designing Optimal Quantum Detectors Via Semidefinite Programming
- Cryptographic Distinguishability Measures for Quantum Mechanical States
- Improved Quantum Algorithms for Fidelity Estimation
- Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics
- Parallel approximation of min-max problems
- Quantum R'enyi and $f$-divergences from integral representations
- QIP = PSPACE
- Two-message quantum interactive proofs are in PSPACE
- Parallel approximation of non-interactive zero-sum quantum games
- Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer Problem
- Generalized Quantum Arthur-Merlin Games
- Non-Interactive Quantum Statistical and Perfect Zero-Knowledge
- The operational meaning of min- and max-entropy
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians