Fewer Qubits, Better Choices: Coupling-Aware Sub-QUBO Selection for Quantum-Assisted Traffic Zone Partitioning
quant-ph, cs.ET
Submitted: 2026-09-26
Updated: 2026-09-26
Code: https://github.com/bstabler/TransportationNetworks
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: Near-term quantum optimizers accommodate roughly a hundred binary variables, requiring large Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problems to be decomposed into hardware-sized subproblems
Terminology
Abstract
Near-term quantum optimizers accommodate roughly a hundred binary variables, requiring large Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problems to be decomposed into hardware-sized subproblems while other variables remain fixed. Variables are typically selected by ranking the objective changes from individual flips. We show that this rule is uninformative once the incumbent is optimal under single-variable flips: every score represents a cost, while remaining improvements depend on overlooked pairwise interactions. A second-order expansion instead yields a prize-collecting densest-subgraph selection problem, solvable greedily in time linear in the number of variables, and two solver-free bounds bracketing the improvement achievable within a selected subset. On transportation networks from Chicago and Philadelphia, our rule with 16-variable subproblems outperforms random selection with 64, demonstrating that quadrupling device capacity cannot compensate for weaker selection. Replacing geometric adjacency with road-network connectivity widens the margin by a factor of 1.6-1.9. With the selection trace fixed, varying the fraction of subproblems solved on a 120-qubit device from zero to one leaves the final objective unchanged to six significant figures. At tested hardware-accessible sizes, gains therefore arise from selection rather than the backend. Hardware feasibility is limited by coupling terms: 120-variable problems fail to compile with 7,260 terms but succeed with 5,118. Compilation scales almost quadratically with term count and dominates execution cost, reaching 1,752 seconds versus 469 seconds of quantum processing.
Sources
- Hardware-Efficient Quantum Optimization for Transportation Networks via Compressed Adiabatic Evolution
- Quantum-Assisted Vehicle Routing: Realizing QAOA-based Approach on Gate-Based Quantum Computer
- Runtime Quantum Advantage with Digital Quantum Optimization
- Quantum Annealing-Enhanced Virtual Traffic Lights and its Evaluation Using a Quantum-in-the-Loop Simulation Testbed
- A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
- Optimal Transport-Based Clustering of Attributed Graphs with an Application to Road Traffic Data
- Clustering-Based Sub-QUBO Extraction for Hybrid QUBO Solvers
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians