Structure-Aware Variance Reduction for Unbiased Randomized Hamiltonian Simulation

arXiv:2606.23544 · quant-ph · Submitted 2026-06-22 · Read on arXiv

quant-ph

Submitted: 2026-06-22

Updated: 2026-09-17

Comments: 31 pages, 6 pages

Code: https://github.com/fredrikhassel/CTEPAI

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Randomized Hamiltonian simulation methods are often governed by a trade-off between systematic bias and sampling overhead.

Terminology

Abstract

Randomized Hamiltonian simulation methods are often governed by a trade-off between systematic bias and sampling overhead. We study how classical variance-reduction techniques can be applied to such methods without changing their mean channel, and therefore without introducing additional bias. As a motivating unbiased estimator, we formulate continuous time-evolution probabilistic angle interpolation (continuous TE-PAI), a quasiprobabilistic random-circuit protocol whose remaining Monte Carlo error is purely statistical. Continuous TE-PAI removes Trotter discretization error with finite-depth random circuits, whereas deterministic Trotterization does so only in the infinite-depth limit. Further, in tensor-network simulations, we demonstrate that discretization error can cause an unphysical exponential growth in the bond dimension required for Trotterized simulations, whereas comparable-depth continuous TE-PAI circuits avoid this growth. We then show that the variance of randomized product-formula-based estimators admits a canonical decomposition into a classical counting component and a quantum ordering component such that the dominant simulation overhead results from the non-commutative parts of the Hamiltonian dynamics. Motivated by this decomposition, we achieve an about70% error-reduction using the counting-component for small systems whereas our tensor-network simulations of n=30 spin-chain dynamics use coarser statistics tailored to the observable and estimator attaining a negligible bias and a reduction of about 80% leading to about91% and about96% sampling-cost reductions, respectively.

Sources

Related papers