A measure for genuine tripartite entanglement
quant-ph
Submitted: 2026-05-04
Updated: 2026-09-22
Comments: 11 pages, 1 figure
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The gist: We introduce a real-valued functional I(1, 2) of four three-qubit correlation expectation values that turns the Greenberger--Horne--Zeilinger (GHZ) algebraic paradox into a quantitative witness of
Terminology
Abstract
We introduce a real-valued functional I(1, 2) of four three-qubit correlation expectation values that turns the Greenberger--Horne--Zeilinger (GHZ) algebraic paradox into a quantitative witness of genuine tripartite entanglement. We prove that I(1, 2;ρ) 2 for all three-qubit states ρ and all direction pairs, with equality if and only if 1 2 and ρ is locally unitarily (LU) equivalent to the GHZ state. We obtain a closed-form I(,) on the five-parameter Acín canonical family of three-qubit pure states; it depends only on λ 0λ 4 and is maximised at λ 0=λ 4 =1/sqrt 2. For the W state, I(,)=0 and 1, 2I W=35/27 about 1.296, strictly below the GHZ value. Maximising the underlying correlation structure over independent local orthonormal frames yields a manifestly LU-invariant quantity E GHZ(ρ) in[0,1] that equals one if and only if ρ is LU equivalent to the GHZ state, equals 35/54 about0.648 on the W state, and is bounded by 1/2 on all biseparable and fully separable states; it is therefore a local-frame-independent indicator of GHZ-type genuine tripartite correlation, obtainable from four Pauli correlators. We relate E GHZ to GHZ fidelity witnesses, analyse its behaviour under local operations and classical communication, and delimit what it does and does not certify about genuine tripartite nonlocality, stating which properties are proven and which (notably global convexity and the resulting genuine-multipartite-entanglement witness threshold) are established numerically and remain open analytically. We also outline a generalisation of I to three-qudit systems built from Heisenberg--Weyl operators, recovering the standard qubit construction at d=2.
Sources
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians