Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient

arXiv:2507.16737 · quant-ph, cs.CC · Submitted 2025-07-22 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.

Kai: Today's paper: "Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient".

Mira: The gist The paper shows that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard,

Kai: First, who's behind it and why it matters.

Paper summary: Kai: So to summarize the paper "Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient," they focus on this central question in information theory: how to optimally encode information when you have a specific noise model.

Mira: The paper sets out to study this question from an algorithmic point of view, given a classical description of a quantum channel Φ representing the noise and an integer k.

Lev: They start by establishing hardness results first, specifically showing that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within some factor one over sqrt(two) plus epsilon is NP-hard for any epsilon greater than zero <ref:2507.16737#pg1,that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient>.

Kai: And they prove this even when the channel Φ is promised to be unital, which means it preserves the identity operator.

Mira: Furthermore, in a restricted setting where the channel is quantum input and classical output and unital, they show that the contraction coefficient is NP-hard to approximate to a factor p over pi plus epsilon for any epsilon greater than zero.

Lev: That hardness result comes from a reduction from the Little Grothendieck Problem, which is what they use to prove the general hardness result.

Kai: They also mention that for some special classes of channels, like if the channel Φ is composed t times where t goes to infinity, then the optimal success probability and hence the contraction coefficient can be computed efficiently.

Mira: That efficient case is something you see in specific scenarios rather than the general case they are proving hardness for.

Lev: The paper also defines some technical terms like the Kraus operators of the channel Φ and how they relate to its Choi state J(Φ), which is a bipartite state on the compound system.

Kai: They use these definitions to precisely define something called the optimal success probability Psucc(Φ, k) for transmitting k messages over that channel.

Mira: They define this success probability using a Positive Operator Valued Measure or POVM, which is a collection of positive operators on the space B(H).

Conclusion: Kai: So to wrap up "Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient," they've shown that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within a constant factor is NP-hard.

Mira: And this hardness implies that determining the optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise is NP-hard as well.

Lev: It’s interesting because it contrasts with what we know about classical problems, which they say are solvable efficiently.

Kai: They also proved the NP-hardness of deciding if the contraction coefficient is equal to one which means the channel can perfectly preserve a bit <ref:2507.16737#pg1,the NP-hardness of deciding if the contraction coefficient is equal to>.

Mira: And as a consequence of that perfect preservation question, deciding if a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least two is NP-hard.

Lev: The paper concludes by establishing a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds on the contraction coefficient, showing how these bounds get tighter with more resources.

Kai: So essentially, they prove that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within a constant factor is hard, and they give us a way to detect when that coefficient is less than one using these SDPs.

Idris Delsol, Omar Fawzi, Jan Kochanowski, Akshay Ramachandran

inria · ENS Lyon · UCBL · LIP

quant-ph, cs.CC

Submitted: 2025-07-22

Updated: 2026-10-14

Comments: 35 pages, 2 figures; minor improvements and corrections. Computational model added. Accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2026.3743741

DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2026.3743741

Code: https://github.com/cvxgrp/scs

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Importance score: 83/100

The gist: The gist The paper shows that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard, which implies that determining the optimal success

Key concepts

Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient ($\eta_{tr}(\Phi)$)
This coefficient measures how much a quantum channel $\Phi$ shrinks the trace norm (a measure of distinguishability) of quantum states. If it's close to 1, the channel is nearly isometric, meaning it preserves information well. Approximating this value within a constant factor is computationally difficult.
Optimal Success Probability ($P_{succ}(\Phi, k)$)
This represents the maximum probability of successfully transmitting a bit through a quantum channel $\Phi$ using $k$ copies of encoding. It is directly related to the trace norm contraction coefficient by the formula $P_{succ}(\Phi, 2) = 1/2 + 1/2 \eta_{tr}(\Phi)$. Finding this optimal probability is equivalent to solving hard problems.
Quantum Confusability Graph ($G_{\Phi}$)
This graph is a mathematical tool used to relate the properties of a quantum channel $\Phi$ to classical graph theory problems. Specifically, deciding if the independence number of this graph is at least 2 is shown to be NP-hard, linking quantum information theory to hard combinatorial problems.
Semidefinite Programming (SDP) Upper Bounds
SDP methods are used here to create increasingly tight upper bounds on the trace norm contraction coefficient. These bounds converge toward the true value, and the convergence speed is quantified by a polynomial function of the dimension $d$ and related parameters, providing a practical way to detect when $\eta_{tr}(\Phi) < 1.

Terminology

Summary

The gist The paper shows that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard, which implies that determining the optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise is NP-hard.

Hardness Results for Contraction Coefficient

The main focus of this paper is to study the maximal success probability Psucc(Φ, 2) for transmitting a bit over the quantum channel Φ, which is connected to the trace norm contraction coefficient ηtr(Φ) by Psucc(Φ, 2) = 1/2 + 1/2 ηtr(Φ) 0 0. In terms of channel coding, this corresponds to deciding the existence of a perfect, i.e., zero-error, encoding of a bit. This decision is equivalent to determining if the independence number of the corresponding non-commutative confusability graph of Φ is greater or equal to k. Theorem 3 shows that deciding whether a non-commutative graph has independence number at least 2 is NP-hard.

Convergence Hierarchy of Upper Bounds

The final result establishes a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds on the contraction coefficient (Theorem 26). The convergence speed is shown in Theorem 28, which states that 0 ≤ SDPm(Φ, k) − Psucc(Φ, k) ≤ poly(d)/√m. These simulations show that the bounds obtained by their SDP are numerically tight.

How it works

The paper proves these hardness results by reducing problems from classical complexity, specifically the Hermitian non-commutative Little Grothendieck Problem, to the computation of ηtr(Φ). For quantum-classical channels, the proof uses techniques similar to the general case, involving constructing a map Ψ and relating ηtr(Φα) to FRn→ld1(R). The optimal success probability Psucc(Φ, k) is defined using a Positive Operator Valued Measure (POVM) as Psucc(Φ, k) = max POVM, ρi ∈ D(H): 1 ≤ i ≤ k 1/k Σ Xk i=1 tr(MiΦρi).

Conclusion

The work establishes that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard, and it provides a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds that can detect when the contraction coefficient is less than 1.

How it works

The proof of Theorem 3 involves constructing a projector Π from a Graph 2-CSP instance G, and then relating the distance between rank-one matrices and S to the contraction coefficient via Lemma 20. This leads to the final inequality ηtr(Φ) ≤ s1 − Ω(1/n3). The construction of Sb⊥ is shown to be an operator system, which allows for the application of Theorem 14 to relate ηtr(Φ) = 1 to the existence of a rank-one matrix in G⊥Φ.

Key Definitions and Tools

The paper defines the quantum confusability graph GΦ as Span(K∗i Kj: i, j). It is shown that for a self-adjoint subspace S containing the identity, there exists a channel Φ such that GΦ = S. The set of separable states SEP(H ⊗ H′) is defined as conv ρ ⊗ σ ρ ∈ D(H), σ ∈ D(H′).

Conclusion

The paper demonstrates that the problem of deciding whether a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least 2 is NP-hard. This is achieved by embedding Graph 2-CSP into the confusability graph of a quantum channel, showing that satisfiability maps to ηtr(Φ) = 1 and unsatisfiability maps to ηtr(Φ) < 1. The paper also presents a hierarchy of SDPs that converges to the optimal success probability Psucc(Φ, k). The convergence speed is bounded by poly(d)/√m.

Key Definitions and Tools

The paper defines the quantum Doeblin coefficient α(Φ) as sup XB∈Herm(B) tr[XB]: IA ⊗ XB ⪯ dAJ(Φ).

Conclusion

The paper concludes that for any channel Φ, whenever αI (Φ) ≥ α(Φ) > 0, we have ηtr(Φ) < 1.

How it works

The proof of Theorem 3 uses the Fuchs-van de Graaf inequality to upper-bound the trace distance between Φ(uu∗) and Φ(vv∗). This leads to the final bound ηtr(Φ) ≤ s1 − Ω(1/n3).

Key Definitions and Tools

The paper defines the Schatten 1-norm as · 1, a.k.a. the trace norm. The Schatten ∞-norm is defined as · ∞, a.k.a. the operator norm. The Hilbert space H are finite dimensional and density operators are positive and unit trace operators in B(H).

Conclusion

The paper provides numerical evidence that the hierarchy detects when a channel has a contraction coefficient < 1. The simulations show that the bounds given by their SDP are numerically tight for amplitude damping channels and depolarizing channels.

Improvements for AI systems

  1. Approximation of Quantum Channel Performance: The system can achieve an optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise by approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within a constant factor, as shown by Theorem 2.

  2. Decision Problem Hardness for Perfect Encoding: The AI can determine if a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least 2 is NP-hard, which relates to deciding if the channel can perfectly preserve a bit, as stated in Theorem 3.

  3. Bounding Contraction Coefficient via SDP Hierarchy: The system can compute upper bounds on the trace norm contraction coefficient using a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming (SDP) upper bounds, specifically showing that SDPm(Φ) = 2SDPm(Φ, 2) − 1 converges to Psucc(Φ, k) (Theorem 28).

  4. Identifying Channels with Contraction Coefficient Less Than One: The AI can detect if a channel has a contraction coefficient less than one by checking if the induced Doeblin coefficient is positive, as Proposition 24 states: "whenever αI (Φ) ≥ α(Φ) > 0, we have ηtr(Φ) Distinguishing Channel Types for Quantum-Classical Channels**: The system can distinguish between a unital quantum channel and a quantum-classical channel by analyzing the structure of its Kraus operators, noting that as Fe∗(I2kd) = 0, Φ∗α is unital, so that, for α small enough, Φα is a channel (Theorem 2).

Abstract

We show that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard. Equivalently, this shows that determining the optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise is NP-hard. This contrasts with the classical analogue of this problem that can clearly be solved efficiently. We also establish the NP-hardness of deciding if the contraction coefficient is equal to 1, i.e., the channel can perfectly preserve a bit. As a consequence, deciding if a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least 2 is NP-hard. In addition, we establish a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds on the contraction coefficient.

Sources

Related papers