Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.
Kai: Today's paper: "Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient".
Mira: The gist The paper shows that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard,
Kai: First, who's behind it and why it matters.
Paper summary: Kai: So to summarize the paper "Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient," they focus on this central question in information theory: how to optimally encode information when you have a specific noise model.
Mira: The paper sets out to study this question from an algorithmic point of view, given a classical description of a quantum channel Φ representing the noise and an integer k.
Lev: They start by establishing hardness results first, specifically showing that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within some factor one over sqrt(two) plus epsilon is NP-hard for any epsilon greater than zero <ref:2507.16737#pg1,that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient>.
Kai: And they prove this even when the channel Φ is promised to be unital, which means it preserves the identity operator.
Mira: Furthermore, in a restricted setting where the channel is quantum input and classical output and unital, they show that the contraction coefficient is NP-hard to approximate to a factor p over pi plus epsilon for any epsilon greater than zero.
Lev: That hardness result comes from a reduction from the Little Grothendieck Problem, which is what they use to prove the general hardness result.
Kai: They also mention that for some special classes of channels, like if the channel Φ is composed t times where t goes to infinity, then the optimal success probability and hence the contraction coefficient can be computed efficiently.
Mira: That efficient case is something you see in specific scenarios rather than the general case they are proving hardness for.
Lev: The paper also defines some technical terms like the Kraus operators of the channel Φ and how they relate to its Choi state J(Φ), which is a bipartite state on the compound system.
Kai: They use these definitions to precisely define something called the optimal success probability Psucc(Φ, k) for transmitting k messages over that channel.
Mira: They define this success probability using a Positive Operator Valued Measure or POVM, which is a collection of positive operators on the space B(H).
Conclusion: Kai: So to wrap up "Computational Aspects of the Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient," they've shown that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within a constant factor is NP-hard.
Mira: And this hardness implies that determining the optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise is NP-hard as well.
Lev: It’s interesting because it contrasts with what we know about classical problems, which they say are solvable efficiently.
Kai: They also proved the NP-hardness of deciding if the contraction coefficient is equal to one which means the channel can perfectly preserve a bit <ref:2507.16737#pg1,the NP-hardness of deciding if the contraction coefficient is equal to>.
Mira: And as a consequence of that perfect preservation question, deciding if a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least two is NP-hard.
Lev: The paper concludes by establishing a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds on the contraction coefficient, showing how these bounds get tighter with more resources.
Kai: So essentially, they prove that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within a constant factor is hard, and they give us a way to detect when that coefficient is less than one using these SDPs.
Idris Delsol, Omar Fawzi, Jan Kochanowski, Akshay Ramachandran
inria · ENS Lyon · UCBL · LIP
quant-ph, cs.CC
Submitted: 2025-07-22
Updated: 2026-10-14
Comments: 35 pages, 2 figures; minor improvements and corrections. Computational model added. Accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2026.3743741
Code: https://github.com/cvxgrp/scs
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Importance score: 83/100
The gist: The gist The paper shows that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard, which implies that determining the optimal success
Key concepts
- Trace Norm Contraction Coefficient ($\eta_{tr}(\Phi)$)
- This coefficient measures how much a quantum channel $\Phi$ shrinks the trace norm (a measure of distinguishability) of quantum states. If it's close to 1, the channel is nearly isometric, meaning it preserves information well. Approximating this value within a constant factor is computationally difficult.
- Optimal Success Probability ($P_{succ}(\Phi, k)$)
- This represents the maximum probability of successfully transmitting a bit through a quantum channel $\Phi$ using $k$ copies of encoding. It is directly related to the trace norm contraction coefficient by the formula $P_{succ}(\Phi, 2) = 1/2 + 1/2 \eta_{tr}(\Phi)$. Finding this optimal probability is equivalent to solving hard problems.
- Quantum Confusability Graph ($G_{\Phi}$)
- This graph is a mathematical tool used to relate the properties of a quantum channel $\Phi$ to classical graph theory problems. Specifically, deciding if the independence number of this graph is at least 2 is shown to be NP-hard, linking quantum information theory to hard combinatorial problems.
- Semidefinite Programming (SDP) Upper Bounds
- SDP methods are used here to create increasingly tight upper bounds on the trace norm contraction coefficient. These bounds converge toward the true value, and the convergence speed is quantified by a polynomial function of the dimension $d$ and related parameters, providing a practical way to detect when $\eta_{tr}(\Phi) < 1.
Terminology
Summary
The gist The paper shows that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard, which implies that determining the optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise is NP-hard.
Hardness Results for Contraction Coefficient
The main focus of this paper is to study the maximal success probability Psucc(Φ, 2) for transmitting a bit over the quantum channel Φ, which is connected to the trace norm contraction coefficient ηtr(Φ) by Psucc(Φ, 2) = 1/2 + 1/2 ηtr(Φ) 0 0. In terms of channel coding, this corresponds to deciding the existence of a perfect, i.e., zero-error, encoding of a bit. This decision is equivalent to determining if the independence number of the corresponding non-commutative confusability graph of Φ is greater or equal to k. Theorem 3 shows that deciding whether a non-commutative graph has independence number at least 2 is NP-hard.
Convergence Hierarchy of Upper Bounds
The final result establishes a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds on the contraction coefficient (Theorem 26). The convergence speed is shown in Theorem 28, which states that 0 ≤ SDPm(Φ, k) − Psucc(Φ, k) ≤ poly(d)/√m. These simulations show that the bounds obtained by their SDP are numerically tight.
How it works
The paper proves these hardness results by reducing problems from classical complexity, specifically the Hermitian non-commutative Little Grothendieck Problem, to the computation of ηtr(Φ). For quantum-classical channels, the proof uses techniques similar to the general case, involving constructing a map Ψ and relating ηtr(Φα) to FRn→ld1(R). The optimal success probability Psucc(Φ, k) is defined using a Positive Operator Valued Measure (POVM) as Psucc(Φ, k) = max POVM, ρi ∈ D(H): 1 ≤ i ≤ k 1/k Σ Xk i=1 tr(MiΦρi).
Conclusion
The work establishes that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard, and it provides a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds that can detect when the contraction coefficient is less than 1.
How it works
The proof of Theorem 3 involves constructing a projector Π from a Graph 2-CSP instance G, and then relating the distance between rank-one matrices and S to the contraction coefficient via Lemma 20. This leads to the final inequality ηtr(Φ) ≤ s1 − Ω(1/n3). The construction of Sb⊥ is shown to be an operator system, which allows for the application of Theorem 14 to relate ηtr(Φ) = 1 to the existence of a rank-one matrix in G⊥Φ.
Key Definitions and Tools
The paper defines the quantum confusability graph GΦ as Span(K∗i Kj: i, j). It is shown that for a self-adjoint subspace S containing the identity, there exists a channel Φ such that GΦ = S. The set of separable states SEP(H ⊗ H′) is defined as conv ρ ⊗ σ ρ ∈ D(H), σ ∈ D(H′).
Conclusion
The paper demonstrates that the problem of deciding whether a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least 2 is NP-hard. This is achieved by embedding Graph 2-CSP into the confusability graph of a quantum channel, showing that satisfiability maps to ηtr(Φ) = 1 and unsatisfiability maps to ηtr(Φ) < 1. The paper also presents a hierarchy of SDPs that converges to the optimal success probability Psucc(Φ, k). The convergence speed is bounded by poly(d)/√m.
Key Definitions and Tools
The paper defines the quantum Doeblin coefficient α(Φ) as sup XB∈Herm(B) tr[XB]: IA ⊗ XB ⪯ dAJ(Φ).
Conclusion
The paper concludes that for any channel Φ, whenever αI (Φ) ≥ α(Φ) > 0, we have ηtr(Φ) < 1.
How it works
The proof of Theorem 3 uses the Fuchs-van de Graaf inequality to upper-bound the trace distance between Φ(uu∗) and Φ(vv∗). This leads to the final bound ηtr(Φ) ≤ s1 − Ω(1/n3).
Key Definitions and Tools
The paper defines the Schatten 1-norm as · 1, a.k.a. the trace norm. The Schatten ∞-norm is defined as · ∞, a.k.a. the operator norm. The Hilbert space H are finite dimensional and density operators are positive and unit trace operators in B(H).
Conclusion
The paper provides numerical evidence that the hierarchy detects when a channel has a contraction coefficient < 1. The simulations show that the bounds given by their SDP are numerically tight for amplitude damping channels and depolarizing channels.
Improvements for AI systems
-
Approximation of Quantum Channel Performance: The system can achieve an optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise by approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient within a constant factor, as shown by Theorem 2.
-
Decision Problem Hardness for Perfect Encoding: The AI can determine if a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least 2 is NP-hard, which relates to deciding
if the channel can perfectly preserve a bit,
as stated in Theorem 3. -
Bounding Contraction Coefficient via SDP Hierarchy: The system can compute upper bounds on the trace norm contraction coefficient using a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming (SDP) upper bounds, specifically showing that
SDPm(Φ) = 2SDPm(Φ, 2) − 1
converges toPsucc(Φ, k)
(Theorem 28). -
Identifying Channels with Contraction Coefficient Less Than One: The AI can detect if a channel has a contraction coefficient less than one by checking if the induced Doeblin coefficient is positive, as Proposition 24 states: "whenever αI (Φ) ≥ α(Φ) > 0, we have ηtr(Φ) Distinguishing Channel Types for Quantum-Classical Channels**: The system can distinguish between a unital quantum channel and a quantum-classical channel by analyzing the structure of its Kraus operators, noting that
as Fe∗(I2kd) = 0, Φ∗α is unital, so that, for α small enough, Φα is a channel
(Theorem 2).
Abstract
We show that approximating the trace norm contraction coefficient of a quantum channel within a constant factor is NP-hard. Equivalently, this shows that determining the optimal success probability for encoding a bit in a quantum system undergoing noise is NP-hard. This contrasts with the classical analogue of this problem that can clearly be solved efficiently. We also establish the NP-hardness of deciding if the contraction coefficient is equal to 1, i.e., the channel can perfectly preserve a bit. As a consequence, deciding if a non-commutative graph has an independence number of at least 2 is NP-hard. In addition, we establish a converging hierarchy of semidefinite programming upper bounds on the contraction coefficient.
Sources
- On the Complexity of Computing Zero-Error and Holevo Capacity of Quantum Channels
- Semidefinite programming hierarchies for constrained bilinear optimization
- A quantum characterization of NP
- Tight Hardness of the Non-commutative Grothendieck Problem
- New Approaches to Complexity via Quantum Graphs
- Super-Activation of Zero-Error Capacity of Noisy Quantum Channels
- Capacities of quantum Markovian noise for large times
- On QMA Protocols with Two Short Quantum Proofs
- Quantum Doeblin Coefficients: Interpretations and Applications
- Quantum Doeblin coefficients: A simple upper bound on contraction coefficients
- Efficient Rounding for the Noncommutative Grothendieck Inequality
- Quantum channel coding: Approximation algorithms and strong converse exponents
- Zero-error communication under discrete-time Markovian dynamics
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians