Quantum counterdiabatic driving enhanced by two-stage local control
quant-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, physics.app-ph, physics.atom-ph
Submitted: 2024-03-04
Updated: 2026-09-18
Comments: 35 pages, 17 figures
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-026-02767-5
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Counterdiabatic driving can suppress diabatic losses during adiabatic ground state preparation.
Terminology
Abstract
Counterdiabatic driving can suppress diabatic losses during adiabatic ground state preparation. As its implementation necessitates the generation of an adiabatic gauge potential, which requires knowledge of the spectral gap of instantaneous Hamiltonians and involves highly non-local controls in many-body systems, local counterdiabatic driving with approximate adiabatic gauge potential has been widely adopted. In this work, using transverse-field Ising model as an example, we present an in-depth study of the performance of local counterdiabatic protocols and provide a closed-form analysis of ground-state-fidelity optimization. We then propose a two-stage protocol based on local counterdiabatic and simple local single-body control to further improve the performance. The practical implementation of these protocols does not require diagonalization of instantaneous Hamiltonians or spectral gaps, and only additional local single-body driving is involved. To benchmark their performance, we experimentally implement digitized adiabatic quantum evolution in a trapped-ion system. We characterize the quality of the prepared states and explore the scaling behavior with system size up to 14 qubits. Our demonstration of quantum shortcut to adiabaticity opens a path towards preparing ground states of complex systems with accessible local controls.
Sources
- Different Strategies for Optimization Using the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm
- Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Optimization
- Quantum algorithms: A survey of applications and end-to-end complexities
- Efficient Paths for Local Counterdiabatic Driving
- A Race Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor
- Efficient DCQO Algorithm within the Impulse Regime for Portfolio Optimization
- Single-Layer Digitized-Counterdiabatic Quantum Optimization for $p$-spin Models
- A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
- A Lanczos approach to the Adiabatic Gauge Potential
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources
- A convergent hierarchy of spectral gap certificates for qubit Hamiltonians