Bayesian Comparison of Covid Origins Hypotheses
q-bio.PE, stat.AP
Submitted: 2026-10-21
Updated: 2026-10-21
Comments: 33 pages,3 Figs,1 Table. about 100 references
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Applying standard Bayesian methods to the most reliably known unclassified facts about the Covid epidemic allows crude estimation of the odds for research-related vs.
Abstract
Applying standard Bayesian methods to the most reliably known unclassified facts about the Covid epidemic allows crude estimation of the odds for research-related vs. purely zoonotic origins. Here a broadly inclusive zoonotic hypothesis is compared with a rather specific subset of the research-related hypothesis defined by known prior work and grant proposals. The important observations are the type of virus, the city of the first outbreak, the lack of known prior hosts, the anomalous early pattern of evolution, and two specific features of the viral sequence. The resulting odds strongly favor research. The odds remain fairly strong under inclusion of uncertainties in prior odds.
Related papers
- Drivers of periodicity in population dynamic models of long-lived, large mammals
- How deterministic trajectories and their fluctuations underlie allele-frequency statistics in the strong-selection regime
- Constraints on the perfect phylogeny mixture model and their effect on reducing degeneracy
- Spatiotemporal noise stabilizes unbounded diversity in strongly-competitive communities
- Invading activity fronts or near-critical clusters may stabilize vulnerable excitable systems against stochastic trajectories terminating in an absorbing state
- Interplay between evolutionary and epidemic time scales challenges the outcome of control policies