Can LLM Agents Resolve Service Failures? Simulating Multi-Turn Complaint Handling under Information Asymmetry

arXiv:2610.24733 · cs.AI · Submitted 2026-10-17 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-10-17

Updated: 2026-10-17

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: LLM agents are widely adopted in service chatbots for rule-guided support and information access, yet emotionally demanding complaint handling still relies heavily on human agents.

Terminology

Abstract

LLM agents are widely adopted in service chatbots for rule-guided support and information access, yet emotionally demanding complaint handling still relies heavily on human agents. We introduce ServiceBench, to our knowledge the first benchmark dedicated to complaint handling, with 2,500 scenarios spanning 184 complaint categories and five service industries. We propose Asymmetric Progressive Complaint Simulation (APCS) to simulate realistic complaint handling, together with a justice-based evaluation framework. Our experiments reveal that even capable LLM agents struggle to handle complaints effectively. They lack the ability to proactively gather information and strategically guide conversations toward resolution, often resorting to premature compensation. We further show that targeted post-training with SFT and DPO substantially improves these capabilities, enabling a smaller model to match or surpass much larger models on several outcomes.

Related papers