Location, Location, Generation: Where You Ask Matters for Generative Engine Optimization
cs.IR, cs.CL, cs.LG, cs.SI
Submitted: 2026-10-16
Updated: 2026-10-16
Comments: 4 pages
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Generative search engines answer local and commercial questions with a written answer and a few cited sources.
Abstract
Generative search engines answer local and commercial questions with a written answer and a few cited sources. A growing practice of generative engine optimization (GEO) monitors which sources and brands these answers show, typically from a single place. In this paper, we present a controlled audit of how the user's location changes the sources that generative engines cite. We ask 300 questions of ChatGPT with 19 declared locations, and of ChatGPT and Gemini from five network locations, each twice to measure run-to-run noise (31,200 answers). The engines take location from different channels. ChatGPT follows the location an application declares, down to the city: it writes the place into its own searches, and its search backend localizes results even when the queries name no place. It ignores the network. Gemini ignores the declared location and follows the country of the network, changing most of its sources even for questions that do not depend on place. The businesses the answers recommend change with the sources. Thus, visibility in generative search is specific to the user's location, and audits must control both channels.
Related papers
- The Price of Isolation: Estimating the Ecosystem Cost of Symmetric Two-Sided A/B Testing
- SCAR: Semantic Continuity-Aware Retrieval for Efficient Context Expansion in RAG
- MixLoRA-DSI: Dynamically Expandable Mixture-of-LoRA Experts for Rehearsal-Free Generative Retrieval over Dynamic Corpora
- How Do LLM-Generated Texts Impact Term-Based Retrieval Models?
- MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory
- From a Large-Scale Teacher to Efficient Multimodal Students for Search Relevance Prediction