Flat Loss, Evolving Features: Grokking in Modular Addition

arXiv:2610.22593 · cs.LG, stat.ML · Submitted 2026-10-15 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, stat.ML

Submitted: 2026-10-15

Updated: 2026-10-15

Comments: 97 pages, 17 figures. Code: https://github.com/akashkumar-d/flat-loss-evolving-features

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Can a network keep learning while its training cross-entropy stays nearly flat at a positive level? We show that it can.

Terminology

Abstract

Can a network keep learning while its training cross-entropy stays nearly flat at a positive level? We show that it can. On modular addition, a standard testbed for grokking, ReLU networks trained with supported-Polar hidden updates, normalized output-layer updates and weight decay can keep 100% training accuracy while their hidden features change and held-out accuracy rises from zero to above 90%, at relatively flat training cross-entropy. Correct classification need not minimize cross-entropy, which still depends on prediction confidence. We prove this coexistence for one-hidden-layer networks in two finite-window theorems from constructed initializations: one gives a constant gain in the Fourier fraction of the hidden features, and the other holds at arbitrarily low positive loss, where a readout refitted on the training data generalizes before the network. Experiments from random initialization show the same coexistence on a window fixed in advance, and in deeper networks held-out accuracy also rises over post-hoc windows with a net increase in training cross-entropy. With a last-layer rate set per training fraction and head decay scaled with the prime, deeper networks at p=47 and 61 meet a criterion on post-hoc windows, fixed in advance, in nearly all fresh runs. A one-block transformer trained with the same updates and a slowly decaying output gain keeps every training pair correct at every logged checkpoint while its training cross-entropy rises and its held-out accuracy approaches one; with two blocks this holds through the held-out rise, after which training pairs begin to flip. A plateau in training loss need not be a plateau in learning. Code: https://github.com/akashkumar-d/flat-loss-evolving-features.

Related papers