Do VLAs Really Follow Instructions? Diagnosing How-Level Instruction Following in Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv:2610.21251 · cs.CV, cs.RO · Submitted 2026-10-15 · Read on arXiv

cs.CV, cs.RO

Submitted: 2026-10-15

Updated: 2026-10-15

Comments: Preprint

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Vision-language-action (VLA) models are expected to follow instructions like their language backbones, yet prior work has focused on What-level instructions that specify the task rather than

Abstract

Vision-language-action (VLA) models are expected to follow instructions like their language backbones, yet prior work has focused on What-level instructions that specify the task rather than How-level instructions that specify how to carry it out. Through our diagnoses, we find that How-level instructions do not help current VLAs and lower task success. We hypothesize that pairing each training episode with a single instruction limits How-level instruction following, and show that training with segment-level enriched instructions makes actions respond to such instructions without consistently raising task success. To measure How-level instruction following beyond standard benchmarks, we introduce SIMPLER-IN, where success requires conditions given only in the instruction. It shows that the gained responsiveness does not extend to demanding or out-of-distribution How-level instructions. How-level instruction following thus remains an open challenge.

Related papers