A Response to the Reply Presented in "A Fair Comparison of Sliding-Mode and Immersion-and-Invariance Observers"

arXiv:2610.20815 · eess.SY, cs.RO, cs.SY · Submitted 2026-10-14 · Read on arXiv

eess.SY, cs.RO, cs.SY

Submitted: 2026-10-14

Updated: 2026-10-14

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

The gist: In response to the reply presented in [Muñoz-Vázquez and Sánchez-Torres(2026)], this technical report extends the experimental evaluation of position-feedback velocity observers and adaptive

Abstract

In response to the reply presented in [Muñoz-Vázquez and Sánchez-Torres(2026)], this technical report extends the experimental evaluation of position-feedback velocity observers and adaptive tracking controllers for a pendular system with nonlinear friction reported in [Cervantes-Pérez et al.(2026)]. The immersion and invariance (I&I) adaptive control scheme proposed in [Romero et al.(2025)], whose gains are tuned according to the guidelines presented in [Ortega et al.(2025)], is compared with a control scheme employing the adaptive modi?ed super-twisting observer of [Dávila et al.(2006)], whose observer gains are selected according to the guidelines proposed in [Muñoz-Vázquez and Sánchez-Torres(2026)]. Although these "tuning guidelines" attenuate chattering in certain scenarios, the experimental results reported here show that they do not eliminate it in general.

Related papers