A Response to the Reply Presented in "A Fair Comparison of Sliding-Mode and Immersion-and-Invariance Observers"
eess.SY, cs.RO, cs.SY
Submitted: 2026-10-14
Updated: 2026-10-14
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
The gist: In response to the reply presented in [Muñoz-Vázquez and Sánchez-Torres(2026)], this technical report extends the experimental evaluation of position-feedback velocity observers and adaptive
Abstract
In response to the reply presented in [Muñoz-Vázquez and Sánchez-Torres(2026)], this technical report extends the experimental evaluation of position-feedback velocity observers and adaptive tracking controllers for a pendular system with nonlinear friction reported in [Cervantes-Pérez et al.(2026)]. The immersion and invariance (I&I) adaptive control scheme proposed in [Romero et al.(2025)], whose gains are tuned according to the guidelines presented in [Ortega et al.(2025)], is compared with a control scheme employing the adaptive modi?ed super-twisting observer of [Dávila et al.(2006)], whose observer gains are selected according to the guidelines proposed in [Muñoz-Vázquez and Sánchez-Torres(2026)]. Although these "tuning guidelines" attenuate chattering in certain scenarios, the experimental results reported here show that they do not eliminate it in general.
Related papers
- One Request, Multiple Experts: LLM Orchestrates Domain Specific Models via Adaptive Task Routing
- A Geometric Decision Procedure for STL Feasibility and Repair
- From Asymptotic to Designer-Assigned-Time Control: A Review of Stability Notions, Design Mechanisms, and Controller Architectures
- Battery Second Life: A Review of Experimental Studies
- Submodular Multi-Agent Policy Learning for Online Distributed Task Allocation in Open Multi-Agent Systems
- Policy-Level Recursive Self-Improvement for Embodied AI with a Criticality World Model