Energy Consumption Analysis of Discrete Diffusion and Autoregressive Language Models

arXiv:2610.19855 · cs.LG · Submitted 2026-10-14 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-10-14

Updated: 2026-10-14

Journal ref: GreenSys '26: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Systems and Methods for Sustainable Large-Scale AI, 2026, pp. 7-12

DOI: 10.1145/3802973.3804458

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

The gist: As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to scale, their energy consumption during inference has become a critical concern.

Abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to scale, their energy consumption during inference has become a critical concern. While Autoregressive (AR) models are the industry standard, Diffusion Language Models (DLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative capable of parallel token generation. In this paper, we perform a comparative energy benchmark of diffusion models (LLaDA-8B, Dream-7B) against AR counterparts (Llama-3.1-8B, Qwen-2.5-7B). We analyze the trade-offs between model architecture, KV-cache optimization, and Joules-per-token efficiency. Our results show that at longer sequences (200--600 tokens), diffusion models achieve 2.5--2.7 J/token, approximately 2 times more efficient than AR models with KV-cache (5.3--5.7 J/token). KV-cache provides substantial benefits for AR models at longer sequences (50--70% energy reduction).

Related papers