From 2.1M Hours of Raw Broadcast Audio to Finnish Speech SSL: Confidence Filtering and Architectural Analysis at Scale
cs.CL, cs.SD, eess.AS
Submitted: 2026-10-09
Updated: 2026-10-09
Comments: Accepted to SLT 2026
Code: https://github.com/aalto-speech/large-scale-monolingual-speech-foundation-models
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Broadcast archives offer scale and diversity for self-supervised learning (SSL) but contain substantial noisy, non-speech, and multilingual content.
Abstract
Broadcast archives offer scale and diversity for self-supervised learning (SSL) but contain substantial noisy, non-speech, and multilingual content. Prior work typically relies on voice activity detection or language identification (LID) to extract speech, ensuring presence rather than quality. Whether and how to filter unlabeled speech by quality for SSL, particularly from noisy broadcasts, remains underexplored. We present a large-scale Finnish SSL study starting from 2.1M hours of unconstrained broadcast audio. We propose automatic speech recognition (ASR) confidence as a proxy for pretraining data quality and show 3-7% relative WER improvements over LID-based filtering despite a smaller training set. We further address the lack of controlled architectural comparisons in speech SSL by evaluating Transformer, Macaron-Net, Conformer, and E-Branchformer at matched parameter budgets. Our models improve upon prior Finnish SSL baselines, particularly at Base scale and out-of-domain.
Sources
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering