Predicting Alignment Generalization with Value Representations
cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-10-08
Updated: 2026-10-08
Code: https://github.com/andyjliu/value-generalization
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: LLM developers post-train their models to exhibit prosocial values and behavioral traits, which are enumerated in an alignment target.
Terminology
Abstract
LLM developers post-train their models to exhibit prosocial values and behavioral traits, which are enumerated in an alignment target. However, while recent post-training developments have yielded models that score highly on alignment evaluations, training models on sets of narrow behaviors still influences their behavior across unseen contexts and environments in unexpected ways. In this paper, we establish the task of alignment generalization prediction, i.e., predicting how fine-tuning a model to follow a given value changes its behavior across a wide range of held-out values. We conduct a large-scale analysis of alignment generalization effects across 66 values found in modern alignment targets, and benchmark representational techniques on the alignment generalization prediction task. We find that representations based on model activations when applying values in context significantly outperform methods based on textual descriptions of the values. Specifically, the best activations-based methods achieve correlations of 0.45 with our generalization matrix, compared with 0.05 from description-based baselines. We then show the applicability of representations that predict alignment generalization toward downstream tasks by using them to measure how similar the values in a multi-value alignment target are, which we find is significantly correlated with model robustness. Finally, we show initial evidence towards a shared, model-independent value space, which we use to develop the first taxonomy of LLM values grounded in empirical generalization dynamics. Our work demonstrates the importance of studying value generalization in LLMs and its application toward the more empirical design and training of model behavior.
Sources
- Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
- Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
- Subliminal Learning Is Steering Vector Distillation
- Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models
- Constitutional Midtraining: Content Presence Drives Alignment Gains
- Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Models
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- Reinforcement Learning Towards Broadly and Persistently Beneficial Models
- What are human values, and how do we align AI to them?
- Model Spec Midtraining: Improving How Alignment Training Generalizes
- Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Production RL
- Open Character Training: Shaping the Persona of AI Assistants through Constitutional AI
- OpenAI GPT-5 System Card
- When Role-playing, Do Models Believe What They Say?
- Olmo 3
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Can Pre-training Indicators Reliably Predict Fine-tuning Outcomes of LLMs?
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering