An analytical model for non-local stochastic field-level galaxy bias on the sphere
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: Astrophysics Radio. Generated commentary on the latest astrophysics papers.
Vera: Today's paper: "An analytical model for non-local stochastic field-level galaxy bias on the sphere".
Jocelyn: The BOLTS model presents a novel analytical galaxy bias model for projected fields on the sphere that incorporates stochasticity and non-locality already at linear order while enforcing physicality and statistical…
Vera: First, who's behind it and why it matters.
Paper summary: Vera: So to recap, this paper introduces BOLTS as a novel analytic galaxy bias model specifically designed for projected fields on the sphere. The core thesis is that you can incorporate stochasticity and non-locality into the bias modeling right at linear order while maintaining physical constraints like statistical isotropy ABSTRACT.
Jocelyn: It claims that instead of a simple deterministic transfer function, we should treat galaxy bias as a statistically isotropic random field where fluctuations enter through variations in the bias itself. This means the mapping from matter density to galaxy overdensity isn't fixed; it has its own internal noise ABSTRACT.
Subrahmanyan: The model yields an explicit decomposition into a linear, non-local stochastic and deterministic component in harmonic space. This allows them to cleanly separate what is physically determined from what is just statistical fluctuation ABSTRACT.
Vera: They fit the parameters using projected power spectra from large hydrodynamical simulations called FLAMINGO. This fitting process lets researchers sample galaxy populations based on simulated matter fields while conditioning the model on properties like halo mass or redshift ABSTRACT.
Jocelyn: The real payoff here is that by construction, the model reproduces two-point statistics down to the simulation resolution. Plus, without being calibrated on it, BOLTS recovers the equilateral bispectrum within the sample variance of a simulation down to comoving scales of O(ten Mpc) for halo masses M > ten eleven point five, over redshifts zero < z < three ABSTRACT <ref:2610.12259#pg1>.
Subrahmanyan: This is important because it shows that even without full calibration, this model performs well for measuring the non-Gaussian structure at scales relevant to galaxy clustering studies ABSTRACT.
Vera: They emphasize that relative to local bias prescriptions, this model more accurately captures amplitude-phase correlations and mode coupling in the measured wavelet phase harmonics where the stochasticity of the tracers is stronger than their discreteness ABSTRACT.
Jocelyn: So, what does this mean for how we use these models? It’s a tool that lets us move beyond simple linear assumptions toward a more realistic description of how galaxies trace matter across cosmic time.
Subrahmanyan: It’s about making sure the tools we use for cosmological parameter estimation are robust over the widest possible range of scales, which is what they were aiming for ABSTRACT.
Conclusion: Vera: So looking at this paper "An analytical model for non-local stochastic field-level galaxy bias on the sphere" and its authors von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Tessore, Joachimi, Hang, Jeffrey, Schaye <ref:2610.12259#pg1>, it's clear they’ve built a framework called BOLTS.
Jocelyn: They’ve created this model to tackle the problem of modeling galaxy bias on the sphere by making it stochastic and non-local from the start, which is a significant development for projected analysis ABSTRACT.
Subrahmanyan: The implication is that we can use this framework not just as a fancy fitting tool but as an analytical prescription for galaxy bias in standard likelihood-based analyses ABSTRACT.
Vera: It’s about improving the accuracy of modeling galaxy bias compared to older linear deterministic models by incorporating these non-local, stochastic effects ABSTRACT.
Jocelyn: And it’s designed to be naturally suited for the projected analyses required by major upcoming surveys like Euclid, Rubin LSST, and Roman ABSTRACT.
Subrahmanyan: So the paper gives us a practical simulator for simulation-based inference pipelines and also an analytical prescription for galaxy bias in standard likelihood-based analyses ABSTRACT.
Maximilian von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Nicolas Tessore, Benjamin Joachimi, Qianjun Hang, Niall Jeffrey, Joop Schaye
Department of Physics, Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University · Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy, Durham University · Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London Department of Physics & King’s Institute for Artificial Intelligence, King’s College London · Leiden Observatory Leiden University
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-10-08
Updated: 2026-10-08
Comments: 20 pages, 16 figures. Submitted to Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Importance score: 75/100
The gist: The BOLTS model presents a novel analytical galaxy bias model for projected fields on the sphere that incorporates stochasticity and non-locality already at linear order while enforcing physicality
Key concepts
- Galaxy Bias as a Random Field
- Instead of using a single deterministic transfer function to map matter density to galaxy density, BOLTS treats the galaxy bias as a statistically isotropic random field. This means the relationship between dark matter and galaxies has inherent fluctuations, which are modeled explicitly through stochastic contributions.
- Decomposition into Components
- The model decomposes the total bias into two parts: a linear, non-local deterministic component (capturing large-scale structure) and a stochastic component (modeling noise and fluctuations). This separation helps isolate the physical effects of clustering from random sampling errors.
- Forward Modeling for Inference
- BOLTS allows researchers to efficiently generate galaxy density fields for different redshifts using parameterized functions. This capability is crucial for simulation-based inference, enabling model comparison with large galaxy survey datasets like Euclid and Rubin LSST.
- Equilateral Bispectrum
- This is a higher-order statistical measure used to probe the non-Gaussian structure of the biased density field. BOLTS predicts this statistic well, even without prior calibration, demonstrating its accuracy in capturing complex correlations beyond simple two-point statistics.
Terminology
Summary
The BOLTS model presents a novel analytical galaxy bias model for projected fields on the sphere that incorporates stochasticity and non-locality already at linear order while enforcing physicality and statistical isotropy. This model matters because it enables efficient field-level forward modelling for simulation-based inference and model comparison with large datasets from forthcoming galaxy surveys including Euclid, Rubin LSST, and Roman, while improving the accuracy of galaxy bias modelling with respect to standard linear deterministic models
How it works
The BOLTS model constructs a statistically isotropic random field by modeling galaxy bias as a statistically isotropic random field rather than a deterministic transfer function It yields an explicit decomposition into a linear, non-local stochastic and deterministic components in harmonic space The model linearly maps an underlying density field, delta, to a biased tracer field, delta b, in projection on the sphere while incorporating non-locality and stochasticity
The construction involves several key steps and assumptions:
-
The standard linear galaxy bias is defined as
-
The general bias model is defined by a tensor that defines the coupling across all angular scales, l, and modes, m
-
To satisfy homogeneity and isotropy, the biased field must be a homogeneous random field such that
-
The stochasticity in the mapping from delta to delta b is introduced through an additional stochastic contribution at the mapping delta → delta b
-
This stochastic contribution is modeled by a complex Gaussian random variable, gammalm, such that blm = βl + γlm
Calibration and Testing
The model parameters are fitted to the projected power spectra measured in large-volume hydrodynamical simulations (FLAMINGO), enabling sampling of galaxy populations from simulated matter fields while conditioning on galaxy properties such as halo mass or redshift The model is validated against the FLAMINGO ‘L2p8 m9’ hydrodynamical simulation across three halo mass ranges and out to z = 3
The accuracy of the model is tested by measuring higher-order summary statistics, such as the equilateral angular bispectrum, B bbblll, which probes the non-Gaussian structure of the biased density field The analytical prediction for the BOLTS bispectrum under specific assumptions agrees exceptionally well with the measured bispectrum of the mocks at all scales
Interpretation and Accuracy
The model separates various contributions to galaxy bias into deterministic bias and stochastic bias, which is a key feature The stochastic amplitude sigma 2 l is derived as sigma 2 l = C bbl/Cl - β 2 l This term absorbs the sampling noise of the discrete galaxy field, and it is shown to be consistent with zero at the per-cent level for the multiplicative coefficient
The model's success is demonstrated by its ability to reproduce wavelet phase harmonic (WPH) moments measured from BOLTS mocks, which match FLAMINGO within the sampling scatter across all WPH coefficient types in the low-mass, low-redshift regime The stochastic term suppresses the amplitude–phase coupling by 4-20% per wavelet scale relative to a deterministic βl mapping
Forward Modelling Application
A semi-empirical extension is introduced that enables BOLTS to be used as an efficient forward model for simulation-based inference This extension parameterizes the per-l parameterization of βl and sigmal using a generalized Lorentzian profile (Equation 37) for the deterministic bias and a sigmoidal function (Equation 38) for the stochastic amplitude These fitting functions allow for interpolation across redshift, enabling efficient generation of galaxy density fields for arbitrary redshifts within 0 < z ≤ 3 by interpolation alone The model is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid, Rubin LSST, and Roman
The BOLTS framework is designed to improve the robustness of joint galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing consistency tests by separating the non-local, stochastic component of galaxy bias from the deterministic, large-scale contribution It can be conditioned on galaxy properties such as stellar mass, star-formation rate, or colour, enabling the study of assembly bias within the same formalism
The BOLTS model is complementary to three-dimensional bias frameworks like Lagrangian Perturbation Theory (LPT) and Hybrid Effective Field Theory (HEFT), as it trades their physical operator basis for a phenomenological description calibrated at the level of angular power spectra, operating directly on the projected sphere The model produces galaxy fields which are statistically more consistent with FLAMINGO than any linear local bias model across halo masses and redshifts
The paper concludes that the BOLTS framework is a practical simulator for simulation-based inference pipelines, while the same parameterization can serve as an analytical prescription for galaxy bias in standard likelihood-based analyses It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al. 2015> The BOLTS framework is designed to improve the robustness of joint galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing consistency tests by separating the non-local, stochastic component of galaxy bias from the deterministic, large-scale contribution It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al. 2015> The BOLTS framework is designed to improve the robustness of joint galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing consistency tests by separating the non-local, stochastic component of galaxy bias from the deterministic, large-scale contribution It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al. 2015> The BOLTS framework is designed to improve the robustness of joint galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing consistency tests by separating the non-local, stochastic component of galaxy bias from the deterministic, large-scale contribution It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al. 2015> It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al. 2015> The BOLTS framework is designed to improve the robustness of joint galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing consistency tests by separating the non-local, stochastic component of galaxy bias from the deterministic, large-scale contribution It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al. 2015> The BOLTS framework is designed to improve the robustness of joint galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing consistency tests by separating the non-local, stochastic component of galaxy bias from the deterministic, large-scale contribution It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al. 2015> The BOLTS framework is designed to improve the robustness of joint galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing consistency tests by separating the non-local, stochastic component of galaxy bias from the deterministic, large-scale contribution It is naturally suited to projected analyses on the sphere, as required by wide-field surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011), Rubin LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009), and Roman (Spergel et al.
Improvements for AI systems
-
textbfStochastic Field-Level Bias Modeling for Simulation Inference: The BOLTS Model Enables Efficient Forward Modelling for Galaxy Surveys by modeling galaxy bias as
a statistically isotropic random field, allowing stochasticity to enter through fluctuations in the bias itself.
This allows forefficient field-level forward modelling
which is crucial forsimulation-based inference (SBI)
when conditioning on properties like halo mass or redshift without needing 3D halo catalogues at every evaluation point. -
textbfHigh-Order Statistic Validation and Model Discrimination: The BOLTS model's ability to reproduce the equilateral bispectrum down to comoving scales of "O (10 Mpc) for halo masses Mh > 10 11.5 M⊙
provides a robust test for distinguishing between deterministic, local, non-local, and stochastic bias prescriptions. This capability allows researchers to
improve the accuracy of galaxy bias modelling with respect to standard linear deterministic modelsby testing against the
true bispectrum measured from the hydrodynamical simulation." -
textbfParameter Compression via Semi-Empirical Functions for Real-Time Inference: By introducing fitting functions, such as the
generalized Lorentzian profile
for deterministic bias and thesigmoidal function
for stochastic amplitude, researchers can compress information into a few parameters per redshift shell. This allows BOLTS to be used as ananalytical prescription for galaxy bias in standard likelihood-based analyses,
making it a practical simulator with only 8 parameters per mass bin. -
textbfAccurate Characterization of Non-Gaussian Morphology via Wavelet Phase Harmonics (WPH): The model's ability to track the WPH moments, specifically the
S01 coefficients,
allows for discrimination between bias models by capturingthe non-linear mode coupling between different scales.
This capability is vital fordistinguishing coherent structures
from incoherent noise, as BOLTS tracks the true S01 within the measurement scatter where local mocks fail. -
textbfRobustness Across Mass and Redshift Regimes: The model's performance across three distinct halo mass bins ("Mh > 10 13 M⊙,"
Mh ∈ [10 12, 10 13) M⊙,
andMh ∈ [10 11.5, 10 12) M⊙
) demonstrates that it ismost accurate in the low-mass regime where non-locality and stochasticity are most prominent.
This allows AI systems to generate galaxy fields that arestatistically more consistent FLAMINGO than any linear local bias model
across various cosmological scales.
Abstract
We present the `Bias of Overdensities in Large-scale Tracers on the Sphere' (BOLTS) model, a novel analytic galaxy bias model for projected fields on the sphere that incorporates stochasticity and non-locality already at linear order while enforcing physicality and statistical isotropy. Rather than as a deterministic transfer function, we model galaxy bias as a statistically isotropic random field, allowing stochasticity to enter through fluctuations in the bias itself. The construction yields an explicit decomposition into a linear, non-local stochastic and deterministic components in harmonic space. We fit the model parameters to the projected power spectra measured in large-volume hydrodynamical simulations (FLAMINGO), enabling sampling of galaxy populations from simulated matter fields while conditioning on galaxy properties such as halo mass or redshift. By construction, the model reproduces the two-point statistics down to the simulation resolution, and without being calibrated on it, BOLTS recovers the equilateral bispectrum within the sample variance of the simulation down to comoving scales of O(10, Mpc) for halo masses M > 10 11.5, over redshifts 0 < z < 3. Relative to local bias prescriptions, it more accurately captures amplitude-phase correlations and mode coupling in the measured wavelet phase harmonics wherever the stochasticity of the tracers exceeds their discreteness, including low redshifts and lower halo masses M = 10 11.5, where non-linearities become important. This model enables efficient field-level forward modelling for simulation-based inference and model comparison with large datasets from forthcoming galaxy surveys including Euclid, Rubin LSST, and Roman, while improving the accuracy of galaxy bias modelling with respect to standard linear deterministic models.
Sources
- LSST Science Book, Version 2.0
- Euclid Definition Study Report
- SimBIG: Field-level Simulation-Based Inference of Galaxy Clustering
- Phase Harmonic Correlations and Convolutional Neural Networks
- Transformationally decoupling clustering and tracer bias
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Field-level weak lensing cosmology with 60 simulations using multifidelity simulation-based inference
- Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
- KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey
- Maximum Entropy Models from Phase Harmonic Covariances
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation