From Chain-of-Thought to Loops: Non-Autoregressive Latent Reasoning via Looped Transformers

arXiv:2610.11472 · cs.AI · Submitted 2026-10-08 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-10-08

Updated: 2026-10-08

Comments: 9 pages, 1 figure

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning often improves language-model performance by giving models additional computation before answering.

Terminology

Abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning often improves language-model performance by giving models additional computation before answering. However, explicit CoT expresses this computation as a sequence of autoregressively generated tokens. Latent reasoning replaces these tokens with compact continuous states, but most autoregressive latent-reasoning methods retain a left-to-right dependency among latent vectors. We introduce LLoCoT: a looped latent-reasoning framework that replaces left-to-right latent generation with iterative refinement of a compact latent workspace. A shared transformer is reapplied for a small number of refinement iterations, jointly updating the latent slots based on the prompt and the evolving workspace state. Using the refined state, a probabilistic head predicts a distribution from which latent tokens are sampled in parallel and used to condition an autoregressive decoder for answer generation. Training uses continuous representations derived from explicit CoT together with a final-answer prediction loss and likelihood-based supervision of the latent states. Across HumanEval and MBPP, LLoCoT achieves the highest mean among the evaluated methods, performing on par in accuracy with Reasoning SFT, our explicit-CoT baseline, while outperforming the base model, answer-only SFT and NF-CoT. Relative to Reasoning SFT, LLoCoT reduces time to the first answer token by approximately 36 times and reasoning-phase latency by approximately 42 times, while increasing end-to-end throughput by 9.2%. This design replaces serial thought generation with parallel latent-slot refinement while retaining probabilistic latent modeling and autoregressive answer decoding.

Sources

Related papers