TokenBank: Financial Infrastructure for AI Services
cs.AI, cs.CE
Submitted: 2026-10-08
Updated: 2026-10-08
Comments: The cloud infrastructure repository is available at https://github.com/Nexilume-AI/nexus-cloud. The hosted deployment can be accessed at https://cloud.nexilume.com/
Code: https://github.com/Nexilume-AI/nexus-cloud
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: AI services incur inference costs during execution, while revenue may arrive later.
Abstract
AI services incur inference costs during execution, while revenue may arrive later. Changing API prices, limited upfront capital, and service failures can limit operators' ability to sustain or expand their services. Beyond reducing per-request costs, operators need to plan future spending, fund execution before revenue arrives, and obtain compensation for specified losses. This requires clear agreements across services with different pricing and execution conditions. These agreements must distinguish rights to consume services from rights to receive payments, define obligations under uncertain costs and income, and specify which failures qualify for compensation and how much can be paid. We present TokenBank, a financial infrastructure that represents these commitments through structured contracts. It supports service-consumption rights, agreements that settle API-price differences in cash (forwards), financing through limited rights to future service revenue, and protection claims for specified service failures. Contracts specify participants, covered services, validity, ownership, fulfillment conditions, and settlement rules. Evaluation combines replay of 899,441 API requests, real model-driven agent execution, and contract API tests. In a zero-discount rising-price resampling scenario, forwards reduce mean expenditure by USD 304.88 but increase its standard deviation from USD 1,152.45 to USD 1,190.82. A controlled replication with five portfolios per capital condition finds mean contribution differences between financing and self-funding of +1.0635, -0.1406, and-0.2962 experimental USD under low, baseline, and ample capital, respectively. The evaluation distinguishes contract correctness from economic effectiveness under declared economic and failure assumptions; supplier invoices and commercial revenue are unavailable.
Sources
- $\tau^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
- FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performance
- RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Data
- Agent Exchange: Shaping the Future of AI Agent Economics
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems