Self-Evolve With a Reference:Anchored Training of Tool-Integrated Agents
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-07
Updated: 2026-10-07
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Self-evolving tool-integrated agents learn from tasks and feedback generated within their own training loop.
Abstract
Self-evolving tool-integrated agents learn from tasks and feedback generated within their own training loop. A Curriculum Agent generates tasks, while an Executor Agent learns from self-consistency signals through reinforcement learning. However, relying solely on the current Executor for feedback has two limitations: group-relative advantages vanish under full consensus, while uncertainty-based curriculum rewards favor disagreement without showing whether the generated tasks support further learning. These limitations motivate an additional reference beyond the current Executor. We propose AnchorLoop, which introduces a frozen copy of the previous iteration's Executor as a historical reference and reuses it on both sides of the training loop. For the Executor, the anchor provides a cross-reference advantage that evaluates current outputs against both current and historical majority answers. For the Curriculum, it provides an agreement-based reference based on differences in sampled majority agreement. Since the Executor and anchor have identical parameters during Curriculum training, this comparison serves as a proxy for task selection rather than evidence of inter-version improvement or correctness. Across 13 reasoning benchmarks, AnchorLoop improves over Agent0 by 2.5% on mathematical reasoning and 2.8% on general reasoning tasks. It also maintains higher effective-advantage variance and continues improving in later iterations as the unanchored baseline shows diminishing gains. These results demonstrate the benefit of introducing a lightweight historical reference into self-evolving tool-integrated agents without external task or answer supervision.
Sources
- Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems
- R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data
- BIG-Bench Extra Hard
- SPIRAL: Self-Play on Zero-Sum Games Incentivizes Reasoning via Multi-Agent Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
- MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model -- From Pretraining to Posttraining
- SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines
- Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework
- Socratic-Zero : Bootstrapping Reasoning via Data-Free Agent Co-evolution
- MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
- Agent0: Unleashing Self-Evolving Agents from Zero Data via Tool-Integrated Reasoning
- SimpleTIR: End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data
- AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems