Shared and structured inputs undermine collective random choice by reasoning AI agents
cs.AI, physics.soc-ph
Submitted: 2026-10-07
Updated: 2026-10-07
Code: https://github.com/github/github-mcp-server
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Terminology
Sources
- Heads, Tails, and AI Fails: LLMs, Randomness, and Human Judgments
- The Illusion of Stochasticity in LLMs
- Playing games with Large language models: Randomness and strategy
- Frontier Models Can Take Actions at Low Probabilities
- Strategic Algorithmic Monoculture: Experimental Evidence from Coordination Games
- Do LLMs Beat Nash? Testing Decentralized Coordination in Self-Play Multi-Agent Games
- Tacit Coordination of Large Language Models
- Emergent Social Dynamics of LLM Agents in the El Farol Bar Problem
- Subversion Strategy Eval: Can language models statelessly strategize to subvert control protocols?
- Subversion via Focal Points: Investigating Collusion in LLM Monitoring
- Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems