TERRA: Learning Transportable Latent Actions through Temporal Effect Representation and Relational Alignment
cs.CV, cs.LG, cs.RO
Submitted: 2026-10-07
Updated: 2026-10-07
Comments: Preprint. Code and project page coming soon
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Latent actions supervise robot policies with action-like codes inferred from visual transitions, and their usefulness hinges on two questions: what a code keeps from a transition, and whether it
Terminology
Abstract
Latent actions supervise robot policies with action-like codes inferred from visual transitions, and their usefulness hinges on two questions: what a code keeps from a transition, and whether it still means the same thing when reused in a different initial state. The first is a tension in time: an endpoint difference discards how motion unfolds, while the full sequence admits nuisance variation. The second is left open by reconstruction, which only ever observes a latent together with the state it came from. We argue that both questions can be answered in the same place. TERRA (Temporal Effect Representation and Relational Alignment) describes a transition by a compact temporal effect, its net feature change together with a low-order within-window dynamics component, and learns a continuous latent from this effect. The same effect space then serves as the reference for reuse: Effect-Anchored Transport (EAT) decodes a latent in other initial states and anchors the resulting effect to the one observed at its source, so that the latent is shaped by what it does across contexts rather than only by the transition it came from. With frozen linear readers, TERRA predicts actions more accurately than UniVLA and a LAPA-style baseline, degrades more slowly under visual distractors, and keeps transported transitions faithful to the donor action as the recipient context moves farther away; a same-budget control shows that these gains come largely from EAT. At matched pretraining scale, the complete system reaches 93.4% average success on LIBERO, compared with 91.8% for UniVLA.
Sources
- $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control
- Genie: Generative Interactive Environments
- What Matters for Latent Actions in Robot Learning
- See Once, Then Act: Vision-Language-Action Model with Task Learning from One-Shot Video Demonstrations
- IGOR: Image-GOal Representations are the Atomic Control Units for Foundation Models in Embodied AI
- villa-X: Enhancing Latent Action Modeling in Vision-Language-Action Models
- LIBERO-Plus: In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models
- Why Latent Actions Fail, and How to Prevent It
- RotVLA: Rotational Latent Action for Vision-Language-Action Model
- LAFP: Preserving Latent Action Structure in Latent Policy Learning via Flow Matching
- Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractors
- DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision
- Learning to Act without Actions
- CoMo: Learning Continuous Latent Motion from Internet Videos for Scalable Robot Learning
Related papers
- Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
- AnchorWeave: World-Consistent Video Generation with Retrieved Local Spatial Memories
- Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
- MambaX-Net: Dual-Input Mamba-Enhanced Cross-Attention Network for Longitudinal MRI Segmentation
- TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models