Child ASR Adaptation with Adult Retention: An Empirical Study

arXiv:2610.08827 · cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.SD, eess.AS · Submitted 2026-09-25 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.SD, eess.AS

Submitted: 2026-09-25

Updated: 2026-09-25

Comments: long paper

Code: https://github.com/qcri/Child-ASR-Adaptation

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

The gist: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems often underperform for children and non-native speakers, while adapting adult ASR models to child speech can cause adult-speech forgetting.

Terminology

Abstract

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems often underperform for children and non-native speakers, while adapting adult ASR models to child speech can cause adult-speech forgetting. We study child ASR adaptation with adult retention across Arabic and English. We compare full fine-tuning, LoRA, and post-hoc weight-space merging across encoder--decoder, encoder--CTC, and AudioLLM-based ASR systems. Experiments use Arabic native and non-native child speech, English MyST child speech, and adult benchmarks from MGB-2 and LibriSpeech test-clean. We evaluate recognition quality with WER and quantify the adaptation--retention trade-off using Retention Index, Child Adaptation Gain, and Adaptation Recovery. Results show that child adaptation is necessary, especially for non-native Arabic and English child speech, but direct adaptation often reduces adult ASR performance. Bilingual adaptation is more stable than language-specific adaptation. Weight-space merging often improves the trade-off, especially for encoder--CTC, Whisper, and AudioLLM-based ASR, with LERP favoring adult retention and TIES recovering stronger child gains. For the encoder--decoder model, direct bilingual fine-tuning remains strongest in raw WER. Code, and models are available at https://github.com/qcri/Child-ASR-Adaptation.

Sources

Related papers