Adaptive Power Sampling for LLM Reasoning
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-06
Updated: 2026-10-06
Comments: 22 pages, 6 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Sequence-level power sampling has recently emerged as a training-free approach to reasoning by sampling from a sharpened output distribution of a base large language model (LLM).
Abstract
Sequence-level power sampling has recently emerged as a training-free approach to reasoning by sampling from a sharpened output distribution of a base large language model (LLM). Nevertheless, existing methods typically sharpen the base model distribution uniformly across queries, overlooking variations in query difficulty and in how well the base model already handles each query. The goal of this work is to equip power sampling with query adaptivity. Theoretically, we show that the benefits of further sharpening are determined by the self-reward gap between correct and incorrect responses. Based on this insight, we propose Adaptive Power Sampling (APS), which adjusts the sharpening exponent on a per-query basis at test time using the relationship between answer agreement and the model's self-reward. Experiments across diverse reasoning tasks, including MATH500, HumanEval, and GPQA, show that APS consistently outperforms power sampling with a fixed sharpening exponent, without additional training.
Sources
- Power-SMC: Low-Latency Sequence-Level Power Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoning
- Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling
- Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
- Sample Where You Struggle: Sharpening Base Model Reasoning via Entropy-Guided Power Sampling
- Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning LLMs: Inference Regimes, Evaluation, and Reproducibility
- Scalable Power Sampling: Unlocking Efficient, Training-Free Reasoning for LLMs via Distribution Sharpening
- Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective
- Depth-Entropy Guided Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoning
- The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Sampling
- Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVR
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters
- Outcome-based Exploration for LLM Reasoning
- Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillation
- Contextual Temperature for Language Modeling
- Qwen2.5 Technical Report
- Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement
- A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems