AutodidactWAM: Cross-Modal Self-Distillation from Generated Video to Robot Actions
cs.RO
Submitted: 2026-10-06
Updated: 2026-10-06
Comments: 8 pages,3 figures, 1 table, ICRA 2027 submitted
Code: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The gist: World-action models (WAMs) such as Cosmos 3 jointly generate future video and robot actions from an observation and instruction.
Terminology
Abstract
World-action models (WAMs) such as Cosmos 3 jointly generate future video and robot actions from an observation and instruction. Adapting one such model with a lightweight LoRA fine-tune to a previously unseen robot, a Unitree G1 humanoid with five-fingered BrainCo hands, exposes a video-action asymmetry: the video renders plausible task executions, while the co-generated action is systematically mis-targeted. We evaluate closed-loop real-robot trials at three cumulative stages: pre-grasp, grasp, and pick-and-place. The native action succeeds only approximately 17%, 10%, and 7% of the time, respectively, and performs worse on held-out objects. We propose AutodidactWAM, a hand-pose estimator trained without teleoperation, followed by inverse kinematics, that runs on the model's generated video to recover action estimates. Paired with the native prediction, these recovered actions provide preferred targets for fine-tuning only the action-related layers, while the generated video is teacher-forced. We compare supervised relabeling with a rectified-flow adaptation of Diffusion-DPO. After one-time embodiment adaptation, self-distillation requires no additional task-specific teleoperation. The recovered-action gate reaches approximately 75%, 47%, and 42% pre-grasp, grasp, and pick-and-place success, compared with 17%, 10%, and 7% for the native action. A hybrid objective combining preference supervision, supervised target fitting, and Cartesian trajectory anchoring (DPO+SFT+DTW) performs best: on Oreo, the training object, it reaches 90% pre-grasp and 20% full-task success; on a held-out object, it reaches 80% and 30%. Plain Flow-DPO reaches 0% success despite 1.000 validation preference accuracy, indicating that the combination of training objectives, rather than the contrastive objective alone, drives the observed gains.
Sources
- Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AI
- Cosmos 3: Omnimodal World Models for Physical AI
- GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots
- EVA: Aligning Video World Models with Executable Robot Actions via Inverse Dynamics Rewards
- VAMPO: Policy Optimization for Improving Visual Dynamics in Video Action Models
- WMPO: World Model-based Policy Optimization for Vision-Language-Action Models
- RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control
- Do as I Do: Dexterous Manipulation Data from Everyday Human Videos
- RoboGaze: Evaluating Robot World Models via Structured Vision-Language Analysis
- Action Agent: Agentic Video Generation Meets Flow-Constrained Diffusion
Related papers
- FMT x: An Efficient and Asymptotically Optimal Extension of the Fast Marching Tree for Dynamic Replanning
- MPCFormer: A physics-informed data-driven approach for explainable socially-aware autonomous driving
- RoboLab: A High-Fidelity Simulation Benchmark for Analysis of Task Generalist Policies
- ARC: A Reasoning Recipe for Robot Foundation Models
- HRDexDB: A 4D Dexterous Grasping Dataset Across Human and Multiple Robot Embodiments
- APT: Action Expert Pretraining Improves Instruction Generalization of Vision-Language-Action Policies