Structured but Silent: Probing Capability Requirements in LLM Hidden States
cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-10-06
Updated: 2026-10-06
Comments: Accepted to AACL-IJCNLP 2026 Findings
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Reliable tool use requires more than triggering a mechanism or matching a query to an API description.
Abstract
Reliable tool use requires more than triggering a mechanism or matching a query to an API description. Before selecting a specific tool, an agent must first infer the capability requirements implied by the user query. In this paper, we investigate whether these query-side capability requirements are linearly decodable from LLM hidden representations prior to generation, and how this hidden-state accessibility compares with explicit verbal classification. We introduce TACIT, a framework that decomposes external requirements along three fundamental axes: Source, Transformation, and World Effect, defining eight structurally distinct capability classes. Using 1,600 balanced training queries from benchmarks, synthetic examples, and new domain scenarios, we train linear probes on pre-generation hidden states from four open-weight LLM families. Our empirical results demonstrate that fine-grained capability structures are linearly decodable with high accuracy across all models. Crucially, however, we expose a representation-to-verbalization gap: these same models are significantly less reliable when asked to explicitly classify the same queries in natural language. This disconnect indicates that information about required external capabilities is linearly accessible in LLM hidden representations but not reliably expressed, a phenomenon we define as "structured but silent."
Sources
- The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lying
- Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision
- Truth is Universal: Robust Detection of Lies in LLMs
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
- Inside-Out: Hidden Factual Knowledge in LLMs
- Estimating Knowledge in Large Language Models Without Generating a Single Token
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- Internal Representations as Indicators of Hallucinations in Agent Tool Selection
- Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset
- Tool Documentation Enables Zero-Shot Tool-Usage with Large Language Models
- LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query
- Mistral 7B
- TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension
- RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now?
- On the Universal Truthfulness Hyperplane Inside LLMs
- The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets
- GPT-4 Technical Report
- LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinations
- Unsupervised Real-Time Hallucination Detection based on the Internal States of Large Language Models
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering