Later Is Better: Token Reduction for ViTs Under Distribution Shift
cs.CV, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-06
Updated: 2026-10-06
Comments: 35 pages. Code: https://github.com/chahh9808/LaterIsBetter
Code: https://github.com/chahh9808/LaterIsBetter
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Training-free token reduction accelerates vision transformers by removing redundant tokens across layers, recovering most of the original accuracy at a fraction of the compute.
Terminology
Abstract
Training-free token reduction accelerates vision transformers by removing redundant tokens across layers, recovering most of the original accuracy at a fraction of the compute. These methods, however, are designed and evaluated primarily on clean data, and under real-world distribution shift their accuracy gap to the uncompressed model widens with the removal rate. We show that this gap is governed by the reduction schedule, the depth profile of removal, usually left fixed as an implementation detail. Concretely, we introduce a one-parameter late-concentrated power-law schedule that consistently improves out-of-distribution accuracy over flat at no extra inference cost. On ImageNet-C with DeiT-S, the late schedule closes 83% of that gap at a 26% compute reduction (+1.17pp), and 99% of it at a lighter 7% reduction (+0.26pp). The gain cannot be attributed to retaining more tokens or using extra compute: held to flat's compute, the late schedule removes more tokens in total and leaves fewer tokens at the end, yet still wins. Single-layer probes point to a mechanism: earlier reductions perturb features that pass through more remaining layers, front-loading reduction error in depth. The effect is broad, holding across five token-reduction methods (ToMe, EViT, ATS, ATC, PiToMe), nine backbones, all ImageNet-C corruption types, eight further shift suites, and two further modalities, video and vision-language QA. It is also specific to shift, still positive on clean and rising monotonically to 4x that at the highest severity 5. The schedule keeps its gain under six test-time adaptation methods, and needs no per-input or per-domain tuning.
Sources
- The Kinetics Human Action Video Dataset
- Analysing the Robustness of Vision-Language-Models to Common Corruptions
Related papers
- Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
- AnchorWeave: World-Consistent Video Generation with Retrieved Local Spatial Memories
- Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
- MambaX-Net: Dual-Input Mamba-Enhanced Cross-Attention Network for Longitudinal MRI Segmentation
- TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models