From Evidence to Action: How Tool-Using Agents Fail
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-06
Updated: 2026-10-06
Comments: 36 pages. Project page: https://safeact.github.io
Project page: https://safeact.github.io
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Sources
- $\tau^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
- Coding Agents Don't Know When to Act
- Ask Early, Ask Late, Ask Right: When Does Clarification Timing Matter for Long-Horizon Agents?
- AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?
- Agentic Abstention: Do Agents Know When to Stop Instead of Act?
- When Agents Overtrust Environmental Evidence: An Extensible Agentic Framework for Benchmarking Evidence-Grounding Defects in LLM Agents
- HiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark): Do Agents Know When to Ask for Help?
- Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering