SPEAR: Five Principles for Interactive Human-Agent Alignment

arXiv:2610.07204 · cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.MA · Submitted 2026-10-05 · Read on arXiv

cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.MA

Submitted: 2026-10-05

Updated: 2026-10-05

Comments: 3 pages. Best Talk Award at the ACM Conference on Human-AI Complementarity and Alignment (HCOMP 2026)

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Recent AI alignment work often frames alignment as a pre-deployment optimization problem: collect human feedback, learn preferences or principles, finetune the model, and deploy an aligned system.

Terminology

Abstract

Recent AI alignment work often frames alignment as a pre-deployment optimization problem: collect human feedback, learn preferences or principles, finetune the model, and deploy an aligned system. This framing has produced major progress, but it under-specifies what happens once AI systems act as agents on users' behalf in situated, long-term, and social contexts. This position paper reframes human-agent alignment as an ongoing interaction design problem. We propose SPEAR, five pillars of interactive alignment: Specification (how people express intent and establish shared understanding), Process (how agents decide when to act, ask, defer, or pause), Evaluation (how people judge whether agents succeeded), Adaptation (how agents adapt to users over repeated use), and Recalibration (how people adapt their trust, expectations, and behavior in response to agents).

Sources

Related papers