CroissantMiner: Automated Extraction and Validation of Croissant Metadata for ML Datasets
cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.DL, cs.IR, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-10-05
Updated: 2026-10-05
Comments: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 (Track on Evaluations and Datasets). Website: https://berkearda.github.io/croissantminer/
Code: https://github.com/berkearda/croissantminer
Project page: https://berkearda.github.io/croissantminer
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Croissant has emerged as a standard for machine-readable dataset metadata, yet populating its fields remains labor-intensive and requires careful reading of accompanying dataset documentation.
Abstract
Croissant has emerged as a standard for machine-readable dataset metadata, yet populating its fields remains labor-intensive and requires careful reading of accompanying dataset documentation. We present the first benchmark enabling end-to-end evaluation of metadata extraction aligned with a community-standard schema. The benchmark comprises 602 papers, including 102 with human-validated gold annotations and 500 with LLM-generated silver annotations, covering the full Croissant schema with both core and Responsible AI (RAI) fields. Using this benchmark, we evaluate a range of extraction systems spanning frontier models, open-weight models, and agentic architectures, under a two-tier evaluation framework that combines rule-based scoring with an LLM judge selected via human audit. We find that single-pass extraction consistently outperforms the four agentic architectures we evaluate: across backbones, these decomposed variants achieve lower accuracy than a single full-context pass. The largest gap appears on long-form RAI fields, which require synthesizing and interpreting information scattered across a paper rather than copying it from a single location, a setting where current systems remain far from reliable. We release the benchmark, evaluation code, judge audit, a live demo, and a leaderboard open to new systems.
Sources
- MeXtract: Light-Weight Metadata Extraction from Scientific Papers
- ExtractBench: A Benchmark and Evaluation Methodology for Complex Structured Extraction
- A Standardized Machine-readable Dataset Documentation Format for Responsible AI
- Do Not Trust Licenses You See: Dataset Compliance Requires Massive-Scale AI-Powered Lifecycle Tracing
- Schema as Parameterized Tools for Universal Information Extraction
- LLMStructBench: Benchmarking Large Language Model Structured Data Extraction
- Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Models
- Datasheets Aren't Enough: DataRubrics for Automated Quality Metrics and Accountability
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering