Will the Judge Flip? Predicting Position-Sensitive LLM Judgments from Residual Stream Activations

arXiv:2610.07115 · cs.LG, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-10-05 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-10-05

Updated: 2026-10-05

Comments: It was submitted to neurips workshop (JUDGE workshop) and received a review score 6.5 combined with one strong accept and one above threshold accept

Code: https://github.com/hashmathshaik/will-the-judge-flip

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: The order in which candidate responses are presented can change an LLM judge's verdict.

Abstract

The order in which candidate responses are presented can change an LLM judge's verdict. Detecting such a position flip ordinarily requires judging each pair in both orders, which doubles the number of judgments. We investigate whether residual stream activations recorded immediately before the initial verdict can predict a flip. We use nested grouped cross-validation to evaluate regularized linear probes on 534 JudgeBench pairs for three Qwen3 judges and Llama-3.1-8B. The linear probes achieve AUROCs of .621-.850 and outperform a combined baseline that uses verbalized confidence, verdict-label logits, response lengths, and the judge's initial choice by .062-.113 AUROC. Linear probes trained on JudgeBench and then frozen achieve AUROCs of .685-.853 on 1,802 MT-Bench comparisons without MT-Bench fitting or recalibration. These results show that pre-verdict activations support prediction of susceptibility to candidate order and outperform the non-activation predictors evaluated here.

Sources

Related papers