Beyond the Linear Representation Hypothesis: Non-Linear Activation Steering in Text-to-Image Models

arXiv:2610.06945 · cs.CV · Submitted 2026-10-03 · Read on arXiv

cs.CV

Submitted: 2026-10-03

Updated: 2026-10-03

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Mechanistic interpretability often relies on the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH), which assumes that high-level concepts are encoded as linear directions in activation space.

Terminology

Abstract

Mechanistic interpretability often relies on the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH), which assumes that high-level concepts are encoded as linear directions in activation space. Yet a natural visual concept does not necessarily require a linear visual transition: between sunny and stormy lies an intermediate weather state such as a sky with a few white clouds, not simply a weaker storm; between a caterpillar and a butterfly, the progression is not a caterpillar with continuously growing wings. This raises the question of whether such true intermediate states are also represented nonlinearly by the model. Indeed, when we prompt text-to-image models directly for intermediate attributes, their activations rarely fall along the straight direction connecting the endpoints. Therefore, we propose KANSteer, which models concept traversal as a curve passing through its intermediate states. Seeking a representation that is both simple and interpretable, we propose to use Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs), which provide a one-dimensional coordinate whose learned functions define the trajectory. This allows the steering direction to vary along the concept while preserving an interpretable representation. Across several concepts and text-to-image diffusion transformers, we find that their activation trajectories substantially deviate from straight lines, and that KANSteer provide a closer fit and smoother traversal of intermediate attributes than linear steering.

Sources

Related papers