Artificial Intelligence and the New Science of Culture
cs.CY, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-05
Updated: 2026-10-05
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Cognition and culture have long been treated as parallel objects of study, joined more by metaphor than by mechanism.
Abstract
Cognition and culture have long been treated as parallel objects of study, joined more by metaphor than by mechanism. We argue they are co-constituted in a manner now empirically tractable: subjectivities can be measured as local trajectories through a high-dimensional cultural field, and the field is itself the aggregate of those trajectories. Recent advances in machine learning, including embedding methods and large generative models, provide the first general framework for measuring this co-constitution from micro-cognition to macro-social structure. Vector geometry recovers individual conceptual structure, organizational communication, and large-scale ideologies; captures multimodal cultural content beyond text; and generates testable predictions about cultural emergence, including the simultaneous arrival of independent discoveries across distant minds. We treat this predictability of simultaneous innovation as evidence for the co- constitutive view: when the geometry of the cultural field is measurable, trajectories of cognitive search through it become predictable. We then examine generative AI agents as simulators of human subjectivity and as a qualitatively new coordinating substrate whose insertion into social life introduces evolutionary dynamics unprecedented in human cultural history. We formalize this reflexive condition as a Heisenberg-like Uncertainty Principle for generative AI: as instruments for fixing a culture's position grow more precise, our capacity to predict its trajectory degrades, because the machinery of cultural description and cultural action have merged. We close with ethical questions raised by AI-mediated cultural drift, recursive synthetic culture, and the limits of human cultural agency, offering guidelines for safe, equitable, and privacy-preserving research on AI and culture.
Sources
- LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Method
- Subjective Perspectives within Learned Representations Predict High-Impact Innovation
- LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law School
- Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models
- Game Theory Meets Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey with Taxonomy and New Frontiers
- The Social Abduction of Science
- GIANTS: Generative Insight Anticipation from Scientific Literature
- Large Language Models as Simulated Economic Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus?
- The Platonic Representation Hypothesis
- Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs
- Linear Representations of Political Perspective Emerge in Large Language Models
- Inducing language models to assert their own consciousness restores human beliefs and values
- Benchmark for Assessing Olfactory Perception of Large Language Models
- Automated Social Science: Language Models as Scientist and Subjects
- Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs
- LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals
- Billions of Sketches Reveal Hidden Cultural Variation in Human Concepts
- Introspective Coupling: Self-Explanation Training Tracks Behavioral Change Despite Fixed Supervision
- Categorize Early, Integrate Late: Divergent Processing Strategies in Automatic Speech Recognition
- Personality Traits in Large Language Models
Related papers
- Reasoning Enhances Robustness to Prompt Injection in LLM-Based Consensus
- Generative AI Purpose-built for Social and Mental Health: A Real-World Pilot
- PersonaMem-v3: Toward Omni-Platform Personal Intelligence for Holistic User Understanding, Recommendation, and Agentic Tasks
- What is an intelligent system?
- AI University: An LLM-Powered Learning Assistant for Engineering---A Finite Element Method Case Study
- Generative AI Use in Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Review and an Empowerment-Entrapment Framework