EMBER-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Event Causal Memory in Long-Horizon Embodied Tasks
cs.CV
Submitted: 2026-10-04
Updated: 2026-10-04
Comments: 26 pages, 4 figures, 14 tables. The first two authors contributed equally. Project page: https://zhaoalexgoat.github.io/EMBER-Bench/
Project page: https://zhaoalexgoat.github.io/EMBER-Bench
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Lifelong physical agents must reason over extended interactions where past events continue to shape the world long after they disappear from view.
Terminology
Abstract
Lifelong physical agents must reason over extended interactions where past events continue to shape the world long after they disappear from view. Beyond recalling what happened, agents must infer how history changes the current state and constrains future actions. Yet existing embodied and video-memory benchmarks largely focus on historical retrieval and summary, leaving such history-dependent causal reasoning underexplored. We introduce EMBER-Bench, an egocentric benchmark for cross-event causal reasoning in long-horizon embodied tasks, for which we newly created the task design, video recording, and data annotation. It contains 189 household tasks and 699 QA pairs, spanning task progress, failure recovery, external interventions, and compound long-horizon tasks with distant dependencies and prerequisites, with fine-grained event and causal-chain annotations. EMBER-Bench evaluates reasoning in both directions: next-action prediction selects the next action from history, and causal traceback, given that action, identifies the historical event that makes it necessary. Input ablations that add action logs or privileged cause-and-consequence annotations to the video indicate which kind of historical information models fail to use. Among the 16 evaluated models, the highest overall accuracy is 61.2%, compared with a mean of 98.3% across two human evaluators. At paired decision points, correct traceback is not associated with correct next-action prediction. Adding action logs yields a gain of 1.6 points, whereas cause-and-consequence annotations yield an additional gain of 13.0 points on top of that. These results suggest that extracting causal information from past events and converting it into constraints on current actions remains a key difficulty for long-horizon embodied agents. Project Page: https://zhaoalexgoat.github.io/EMBER-Bench/
Sources
- Qwen3-VL Technical Report
- RMBench: Memory-Dependent Robotic Manipulation Benchmark with Insights into Policy Design
- VidEgoThink: Assessing Egocentric Video Understanding Capabilities for Embodied AI
- RoboMME: Benchmarking and Understanding Memory for Robotic Generalist Policies
- Plan, Watch, Recover: A Benchmark and Architectures for Proactive Procedural Assistance
- Embodied Agents Meet Personalization: Investigating Challenges and Solutions Through the Lens of Memory Utilization
- RoboMemArena: A Comprehensive and Challenging Robotic Memory Benchmark
- EgoSAT: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Egocentric Streaming Interaction Understanding
- $\pi_{0.5}$: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization
- RoboVQA: Multimodal Long-Horizon Reasoning for Robotics
- EgoMemReason: A Memory-Driven Reasoning Benchmark for Long-Horizon Egocentric Video Understanding
- FindingDory: A Benchmark to Evaluate Memory in Embodied Agents
- TeleEgo: Benchmarking Egocentric AI Assistants in the Wild
Related papers
- Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
- AnchorWeave: World-Consistent Video Generation with Retrieved Local Spatial Memories
- Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
- MambaX-Net: Dual-Input Mamba-Enhanced Cross-Attention Network for Longitudinal MRI Segmentation
- TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models