Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM Agents
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-03
Updated: 2026-10-03
Comments: The 5th International Conference on Human and Artificial Rationalities
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Agentic large language model (LLM) systems are commonly implemented as an LLM in a loop with Planning, Memory, Tools, and Control Flow.
Terminology
Abstract
Agentic large language model (LLM) systems are commonly implemented as an LLM in a loop with Planning, Memory, Tools, and Control Flow. This application-focused view connects agentic LLM research with deployable systems and leaves open how such systems should be evaluated beyond end-to-end task success. Building on this view, we define agentic cognitive depth as a trajectory-level profile across five operational criteria. The profile contains context sensitivity (C), temporal continuity (T), multimodal coordination (M), adaptive interaction (A), and metacognitive monitoring (Mc). The first four criteria measure how well Control Flow, Memory, Tools, and Planning are used across a trajectory. The fifth measures whether the system monitors and regulates the full run. For each criterion, we give operational proxies and a perturbation procedure, then connect the profile to the agent's world model. We provide the structure needed to extend benchmarks such as GAIA, SWE-bench, WebArena, and TRIP-Bench with per-criterion diagnostics. Symbolic verifiers, structured memory, planner coupling, and tool constraints provide practical ways to build and test these capacities.
Sources
- ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence
- Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI): Architectures, Taxonomies, and Evaluation of Large Language Model Agents
- The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning
- On the Measure of Intelligence
- ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systems
- Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond
- Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review
- General Agentic Planning Through Simulative Reasoning with World Models
- SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
- World Models
- When Refusals Fail: Unstable Safety Mechanisms in Long-Context LLM Agents
- Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
- AI Agents That Matter
- A Proposal to Extend the Common Model of Cognition with Metacognition
- LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency
- From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms
- Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal
- Why AI is Harder Than We Think
- MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems
- Bridging LLM Planning Agents and Formal Methods: A Case Study in Plan Verification
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems