Representation-Aligned Auxiliary Supervision for Language Model Adaptation
cs.CL, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-10-02
Updated: 2026-10-02
Comments: NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on LP4FM Oral
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet adapting them to structured domains remains challenging and can yield inconsistent outcomes.
Terminology
Abstract
Language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet adapting them to structured domains remains challenging and can yield inconsistent outcomes. We identify representation compatibility, the extent to which a model effectively processes a representation for a structured task, as a key factor in adaptation. We study this in chess, which provides a controlled testbed with precise semantics, computable optimal actions, and multiple state representations, including a symbolic encoding (FEN) and a spatial format (ASCII). We find that models often process semantically equivalent inputs substantially differently, affecting both learning and generalization. Building on this observation, we propose representation-aligned auxiliary supervision, which uses environment-derived tasks expressed in compatible representations to improve adaptation to structured domains. Across models and representations, auxiliary supervision consistently improves optimal-move prediction relative to target-only training under identical target data. Tasks that expose environment dynamics provide larger and most consistent gains than surface-level or static supervision, while remaining competitive with substantially increasing the amount of target-task data. Moreover, ASCII-trained models transfer more effectively to FEN than FEN-trained models do to ASCII, even surpassing the FEN target-only baseline on FEN evaluation. The gains also extend beyond optimal-move prediction to open-ended, factually grounded commentary generation. Overall, our results show that auxiliary supervision in model-compatible representations can enable effective adaptation in structured domains.
Sources
- DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- Why Do LLM Agents Fail in Exploring New Environments? A World-Modeling Perspective
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Olmo 3
- Explore the Reasoning Capability of LLMs in the Chess Testbed
- Mastering Board Games by External and Internal Planning with Language Models
- Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering