ReFract: Benchmarking Perspective Awareness in Language Model Agents with Text World Models
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-02
Updated: 2026-10-02
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings such as industrial maintenance and equipment fault troubleshooting, where workers occupy a variety of roles.
Terminology
Abstract
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings such as industrial maintenance and equipment fault troubleshooting, where workers occupy a variety of roles. A capable agent must therefore act in a way that is calibrated to user's role: taking actions and providing information that respect the role's knowledge and capability boundaries. Unlike coding, where mistakes are usually recoverable, agent responses in these settings are enacted on physical equipment, and can therefore cause irreversible equipment damage, production loss, or personnel harm. Existing benchmarks, however, largely overlook the need for agents to infer what a role intends and acting only through tools that role may legitimately use, a capability which we term Perspective Awareness. To this end, we introduce ReFract, a benchmark of 150 expert-validated entries in which an agent must act differently in response to the same query depending on user's role. Entries of ReFract are grounded in anonymized queries from domain support conversations, against which we construct Text World Models that simulate the agent's operating environments and assemble perspective-aware action trajectories. State-of-the-art LLMs solve at most 69% of the tasks with more than 50% of their trajectories contain attempts of taking perspective-violating actions. ReFract exposes perspective awareness as a distinct, largely unsolved axis of agent evaluation and motivates agents that calibrate not just how to act, but for whom.
Sources
- $\tau^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents
- gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card
- AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments
- Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasets
- From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to the Probabilistic Language of Thought
- $\tau$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
- SocioVerse: A World Model for Social Simulation Powered by LLM Agents and A Pool of 10 Million Real-World Users
- How FaR Are Large Language Models From Agents with Theory-of-Mind?
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems