Reply to "Comment on 'Topography of Fermi arcs in t-PtBi2 using high-resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy'"

In a recent work [1] we demonstrated that the Fermi arcs in t-PtBi2 are indeed disconnected segments of the Fermi surface. We showed that the surface state band crosses EF between Weyl points and is has finite band gap at all other momenta until it merges with bulk bands. We did not find evidence of a superconducting gap in the spectra down to 3K. In recent Comment, Sergey Borisenko reanalyzed data from repository posted with our paper and concluded that a superconducting gap with i-wave symmetry is present in our data up to temperatures of 19K. We argue that this claim arises from incorrect identification of the location of Fermi arc and confusion between band gap and superconducting gap. This error was compounded by the fact that Author of the Comment analyzed data from interpolated images used for mapping the Fermi surface that are not suitable for extraction of energy gap on meV scale. This fact was previously communicated to the Author of the Comment during e-mail exchange. We maintain that our conclusion of absence of a superconducting gap above 3 K are valid and consistent with recent STM measurements performed on the same samples, which found surface superconductivity with Tc = 3K, below the temperature at which the data for our ARPES paper was measured.