Beyond State-of-the-Art: Standardising Environmental Impact Metrics for AI Research
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-01
Updated: 2026-10-01
Code: https://github.com/LudvikGalois/carbonbenchmark
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: As the capabilities and ubiquity of Large Language Models (LLMs) grow, so does their environmental footprint.
Abstract
As the capabilities and ubiquity of Large Language Models (LLMs) grow, so does their environmental footprint. Despite calls for responsible AI, the machine learning community lacks standardised practices for carbon accounting. Our automated literature review of the 5,285 papers accepted to NeurIPS 2025 reveals that reporting of environmental impact is nearly non-existent. To catalyse a shift toward sustainable AI, we define standardised sustainability metrics for evaluating model training efficiency, accompanied by simple heuristics to estimate the carbon cost of LLM inference. We implement these metrics in carbonbenchmark, a drop-in software solution for tracking and reporting emissions. Finally, to combat the pursuit of marginal accuracy gains at disproportionate environmental costs, we formalise the `Smallest Model that Achieves the Job' (SMAJ), a framework which challenges the field to prioritise computational efficiency and environmental accountability alongside traditional `State-of-the-Art' (SotA) accuracy.
Sources
- Beyond the Loss Curve: Scaling Laws, Active Learning, and the Limits of Learning from Exact Posteriors
- Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems