PG-SFT: Balancing Capability Acquisition and Retention in Offline Agent Fine-Tuning
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-10-01
Updated: 2026-10-01
Code: https://github.com/SWE-bench/SWE-bench
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on offline agent trajectories is the standard approach for training specialized tool-using agents, but forcing models to imitate reasoning and actions token by token may
Terminology
Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on offline agent trajectories is the standard approach for training specialized tool-using agents, but forcing models to imitate reasoning and actions token by token may harm other capabilities (e.g., general reasoning, tool calling, code generation) of the base model. In this work, we focus on studying how to better balance the trade-off between acquiring new capabilities and preserving existing ones during agent trace SFT. By comparing several baselines in our setup, standard SFT improves the target benchmark while lowering several non-target benchmark scores; meanwhile, simply constraining distributional drift using KL penalty or limiting the update magnitude did not avoid this regression trend. Motivated by recent token-wise adaptive learning objectives, this work proposes Privilege-Guided SFT (PG-SFT) to leverage turn-level information gain of agent trajectories as an indicator to adjust supervision strength. PG-SFT yields a more favorable observed trade-off on the evaluated benchmarks, substantially reducing distributional drift and broad capability degradation at the cost of slight degradation in target-task performance. Our findings suggest that balancing the acquisition--retention trade-off depends not only on whether the model is anchored to its base behavior, but also on where and how strongly supervision should depart from that behavior.
Sources
- LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Less
- AlpaGasus: Training A Better Alpaca with Fewer Data
- Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
- Privileged, but Biased: How PI-Conditioned Teachers Break Self-Distillation
- Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
- Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoning
- Rethinking On-Policy Self-Distillation for Thinking Models
- SFT Doesn't Always Hurt General Capabilities: Revisiting Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning in LLMs
- SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflection
- An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning
- Privileged Information Distillation for Language Models
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- InfoSFT: Learn More and Forget Less with Information-Aware Token Weighting
- RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Less
- Learning by Distilling Context
- Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
- MemSFT: Mitigating Alignment Tax with an External Parametric Memory
- Mask the Target: A Plug-and-Play Regularizer Against LoRA Forgetting
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems