Reason in Style: Discovering and Controlling Style in Language Models
cs.CL, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-09-30
Updated: 2026-09-30
Comments: 38 pages, 12 figures
Code: https://github.com/ioanam25/reason-in-style
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: Language models learn content and style jointly, making stylistic variation in their outputs difficult to identify and control.
Terminology
Abstract
Language models learn content and style jointly, making stylistic variation in their outputs difficult to identify and control. We study whether recurring styles in model responses can be discovered without supervision and explicitly controlled. We design an algorithm that learns to separate representations of content and style from language models' outputs and validate its effectiveness on math questions in a controlled setting. By applying this method to over 100K verified traces from nine distinct teacher models, we discover six recurring yet imbalanced styles. We then fine-tune smaller student models to follow these styles when explicitly conditioned on them, using importance weighting to balance the contribution of the styles represented in the corpus. This approach improves Pass@ k over standard fine-tuning on the same data across six math reasoning benchmarks, demonstrating that we can diversify the style of answers effectively. We confirm that this also results in strong correspondence between requested and realized styles. We find that style affects correctness: the probability of solving a problem depends on the style we condition on, and different problems benefit from different styles. In summary, our results show that stylistic variation in model-generated data can be discovered in an unsupervised way, and made explicit, providing a source of both control and improved reasoning performance.
Sources
- Phi-4-reasoning Technical Report
- Your thoughts tell who you are: Characterize the reasoning patterns of LRMs
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- Olmo 3
- Gemma 4 Technical Report
- When the Strongest Teacher Is Not the Best Teacher: Student-Centric Answer Selection
- How to Fine-Tune a Reasoning Model? A Teacher-Student Cooperation Framework to Synthesize Student-Consistent SFT Data
- Supervised Contrastive Block Disentanglement
- Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4
- gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Report
- Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
- Qwen2.5 Technical Report
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering