ReLiveGym: Evaluating Long-Lived Agents over Weeks of Replayed Reality
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-30
Updated: 2026-09-30
Comments: 9 pages. Preprint
Code: https://github.com/SaharaLabsAI/ReLiveGym
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: As large language model (LLM) agents become widely adopted, they are increasingly deployed for tasks that require persistent monitoring or recurring actions (e.g., market analysis).
Abstract
As large language model (LLM) agents become widely adopted, they are increasingly deployed for tasks that require persistent monitoring or recurring actions (e.g., market analysis). These agents are expected to operate unattended for days or weeks, act at the right timing, and adapt to the dynamic environment over time. These challenges are not fully captured in the existing long-horizon agent work, as they often consider a static environment that is not temporally changing. We introduce ReLiveGym, a diagnostic evaluation environment of long-lived tasks in which agents act sparsely over simulated weeks of chronologically replayed real-world news, market, and social-media streams. The tasks span diverse levels of time sensitivity, reasoning intensity, and recurrence. Across eight base language models, we investigate how model choice and harness design affect agent performance on such long-lived tasks. Our results show that how agents determine when to act arises as an important harness-design axis for long-lived tasks; and that the optimal design varies across tasks and sometimes model choices as well. We also evaluate how continuous learning from hindsight feedback affects performance and addresses failure modes observed in these long-lived tasks. These findings indicate model choice, action timing mechanism, and use of feedback as important considerations in the design of long-lived agents. Code: https://github.com/SaharaLabsAI/ReLiveGym
Sources
- GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning
- ARE: Scaling Up Agent Environments and Evaluations
- Agentic Time Machine as an Infrastructure for Future-Event Forecasting
- StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets?
- FutureSim: Replaying World Events to Evaluate Adaptive Agents
- Robotouille: An Asynchronous Planning Benchmark for LLM Agents
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
- Continual Harness: Online Adaptation for Self-Improving Foundation Agents
- Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses
- INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent
- Do Proactive Agents Need an LLM to Decide When to Act?
- Adaptive Auto-Harness: Sustained Self-Improvement for Agentic System Deployment on Open-Ended Task Streams
- SentinelBench: A Benchmark for Long-Running Monitoring Agents
- Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces
- AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery
- ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memory
- When Agents Trade: Live Multi-Market Trading Benchmark for LLM Agents
- Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents
- Agent Workflow Memory
- Real-Time Reasoning Agents in Evolving Environments
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems