Just Align x: Aligning Predictions, Not Representations
cs.CV
Submitted: 2026-09-30
Updated: 2026-09-30
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Representation alignment has become an effective way to accelerate diffusion training, but its benefits do not transfer reliably to pixel-space clean-image prediction.
Terminology
Abstract
Representation alignment has become an effective way to accelerate diffusion training, but its benefits do not transfer reliably to pixel-space clean-image prediction. In JiT, we find that auxiliary feature alignment can improve access to semantic features while reducing access to image variation needed for clean-image prediction, creating a mismatch between the auxiliary objective and the denoising task. This suggests a different principle: auxiliary supervision should improve the prediction target itself rather than impose a separate representation target. We introduce JAx (Just Align x), a prediction-supervision method that aligns clean-image predictions across noise levels. JAx couples a noisier student observation with a cleaner observation through a Markov degradation that preserves the original JiT input distribution. Under this coupling, the oracle prediction from the cleaner state has the same conditional mean as the optimal JiT target, while its conditional target covariance is no greater. Thus, oracle prediction alignment preserves the population JiT objective up to a constant while providing a lower-variance training target. To make this construction practical with an imperfect EMA teacher, JAx combines ground-truth supervision with a reliability-gated coupling band that selects nearby teacher states based on prediction risk. On ImageNet 256x256, JAx consistently improves FID and accelerates convergence across JiT-B/16, L/16, and H/16, without an external encoder or changes to the architecture or sampling procedure. Gradient diagnostics further show reduced minibatch gradient variance, while ablations demonstrate that the gains cannot be explained by time reweighting alone. These results show that prediction-space supervision provides a simple and principled alternative to representation alignment for pixel-space generative models.
Sources
- Latent Forcing: Reordering the Diffusion Trajectory for Pixel-Space Image Generation
- Self-Supervised Flow Matching for Scalable Multi-Modal Synthesis
- Asymmetric Flow Models
- PixelFlow: Pixel-Space Generative Models with Flow
- Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance
- Efficient Generative Model Training via Embedded Representation Warmup
- Improved Baselines with Representation Autoencoders
- SRA 2: Variational Autoencoder Self-Representation Alignment for Efficient Diffusion Training
- Diffuse and Disperse: Image Generation with Representation Regularization
- Stable Velocity: A Variance Perspective on Flow Matching
Related papers
- Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
- AnchorWeave: World-Consistent Video Generation with Retrieved Local Spatial Memories
- Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
- MambaX-Net: Dual-Input Mamba-Enhanced Cross-Attention Network for Longitudinal MRI Segmentation
- TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models