Target-Dependent Limits of Causal Repair: A Leading-Log Frontier in a Gaussian Model

Knowing how much a causal predictor could improve need not reveal the gain of the repair actually learned. We quantify this gap in a scalar Gaussian causal experiment with known intervention geometry: auxiliary data identify effect magnitude up to bounded contamination, while diagnostics identify direction. The target is the squared-loss gain of the realized trained repair relative to a fitted reference. Jointly optimizing the learner and assessor under uniform learning MSE η avoids the trivial solution of making no repair. At the usual 1/k learning scale, every feasible learner incurs a k-2 assessment floor, even when oracle potential is estimable at a faster rate. In the magnitude-rich regime, we characterize a sharp leading-log frontier: the assessment exponent is to first relative order, where k= (1/(k 2E k)) and E k is auxiliary precision. A diagnostic-abstention rule attains this exponent with unknown nuisance parameters. We also bound the critical allowance window and transfer the frontier to adaptive sampling by exact Gaussian simulation. Finite-grid experiments distinguish sign-tail suppression from total MSE and expose conservative finite-budget behavior. The result isolates how the assessment target changes information requirements in this experiment; it is not a general causal identifiability claim.