Robust and Learned Online Matching in Growing Trees
cs.DS, cs.LG, math.PR
Submitted: 2026-09-30
Updated: 2026-09-30
Comments: 14 pages, 1 figure, 1 table
Code: https://github.com/mgalazka84/robust-online-matching
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We study irrevocable maximum-cardinality matching in trees revealed by successive leaf attachments, with a known horizon and an exogenous growth law that is misspecified or unknown.
Abstract
We study irrevocable maximum-cardinality matching in trees revealed by successive leaf attachments, with a known horizon and an exogenous growth law that is misspecified or unknown. For deterministic affine attachment forecasts with nonnegative degree reinforcement, the optimal threshold policy loses at most twice the cumulative expected conditional total-variation error relative to an online oracle knowing the actual growth law. This follows from a unit-span property of the Bellman continuation score and has no additional horizon factor. A four-vertex example attains the coefficient two for the specified deterministic policy, and a two-model argument gives a lower bound linear in the model-error budget for arbitrary policies under general misspecification. For uniform-preferential attachment, the local error has an exact expression through the leaf count. When its constant mixture parameter is unknown, we estimate it from the same growing tree and update the threshold policy at geometric times. A parameter-sensitivity bound for individual Bellman prices and uniform degree-moment estimates yield expected regret O(sqrt n squared n), using O(n squared n) arithmetic operations and O(n) stored entries. The exact minimax rate remains open.
Sources
- With a Little Help From My Friends: Exploiting Probability Distribution Advice in Algorithm Design
- Statistical Inference in Parametric Preferential Attachment Trees
- Learning in Markov Decision Processes with Exogenous Dynamics
Related papers
- Cascaded Learned Bloom Filter for Optimizing Model-Filter Size Balance and Fast Rejection
- Computational and Statistical Hardness of Calibration Distance
- Edge-Private Matching Kernels Through Local Decoding
- Tight Bounds for Equivalence Testing with Non-Adaptive Conditional Samples
- Local Node Differential Privacy
- Cheaper by the Batch: Shared Traversal for Genotype Graph Editing