Bandits with Multiple Optimal Arms: Minimax Regret and Non-Adaptivity
stat.ML, cs.AI, cs.LG, math.ST, stat.ME, stat.TH
Submitted: 2026-09-29
Updated: 2026-10-01
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We study multi-armed bandits (MAB) with multiple optimal arms, motivated by the fact that many practical decision making problems admit multiple correct answers.
Terminology
Abstract
We study multi-armed bandits (MAB) with multiple optimal arms, motivated by the fact that many practical decision making problems admit multiple correct answers. For K-armed bandits with A optimal arms, we first provide a sharper analysis of previous sub-sampling algorithms (De Heide et al., 2021; Zhu and Nowak, 2020), establishing a (K-A over sqrt KA sqrt T) minimax regret, where T is the total number of interactions and O(times) drops all constant and logarithmic factors, improving the previous (sqrt KT/A) regret. We then provide a matching lower bound up to logarithmic factors, indicating that our established rate is nearly minimax-optimal. We further show that the knowledge of A up to (1) factors is necessary to achieve near-optimal regret, as near-optimal algorithms for one number of optimal arms must incur substantially larger regret than optimal regret for a smaller number. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive minimax characterization of K-armed bandits with A over the entire range of 1 at most A at most K-1.
Sources
Related papers
- Behavior of prediction performance metrics with rare events
- Optimal Estimation of Generic Dynamics by Path-Dependent Neural Jump ODEs
- A Posterior-Dynamics Framework for Imaging Inverse Problems with Pretrained Diffusion Priors
- Efficient quadratic entropy with distance sketches
- Embedding-Bias in Conditional Independence Testing
- From Log-Odds to Shapley Values: An Explanatory Geometry for the Weighted Naive Bayes Classifier